Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26556038›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2015

Two alternative pathways for generating transmissible prion disease de novo.

Natallia Makarava, Regina Savtchenko, Ilia V Baskakov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modeling PrPFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analyses of N-linked glycans of PrPThe FEBS journal · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sialylation Controls Prion FateThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natallia MakaravaCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 111 S. Penn St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. NMakarava@umaryland.edu.
Regina SavtchenkoCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 111 S. Penn St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. rsavtchenko@yahoo.com.
Ilia V BaskakovCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 111 S. Penn St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. Baskakov@umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Self-Propagating Mechanism of Prion DiseasesR01NS045585 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI Ilia V Baskakov · 2003 to 2026
$9.6M
Elucidating molecular structure of mammalian prionsR01NS074998 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BASKAKOV, ILIA V · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045585NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies established that prion disease with unique strain-specific phenotypes could be induced by in vitro-formed recombinant PrP (rPrP) fibrils with structures different from that of authentic prions, or PrP(Sc). To explain the etiology of prion diseases, new mechanism proposed that in animals the transition from rPrP fibrils to PrP(Sc) consists of two main steps: the first involves fibril-induced formation of atypical PrPres, a self-replicating but clinically silent state, and the second consists of atypical PrPres-dependent formation of PrP(Sc) via rare deformed templating events.

resultsIn the current study, atypical PrPres with characteristics similar to those of brain-derived atypical PrPres was generated in vitro. Upon inoculation into animals, in vitro-generated atypical PrPres gave rise to PrP(Sc) and prion disease with a phenotype similar to those induced by rPrP fibrils. Significant differences in the sialylation pattern between atypical PrPres and PrP(Sc) suggested that only a small sub-fraction of the PrP(C) that is acceptable as a substrate for PrP(Sc) could be also recruited by atypical PrPres. This can explain why atypical PrPres replicates slower than PrP(Sc) and why PrP(Sc) outcompetes atypical PrPres.

conclusionsThis study illustrates that transmissible prion diseases with very similar disease phenotypes could be produced via two alternative procedures: direct inoculation of recombinant PrP amyloid fibrils or in vitro-produced atypical PrPres. Moreover, this work showed that preparations of atypical PrPres free of PrP(Sc) can give rise to transmissible diseases in wild type animals and that atypical PrPres generated in vitro is an adequate model for brain-derived atypical PrPres.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAmyloidAnimalsBrainCricetinaePhenotypePrion DiseasesPrionsProtein FoldingRecombinant ProteinsAmyloidPrionsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26556038
PMCPMC4641408
OpenAlexW2112514172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.