Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26555945›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation2016

Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial.

Edward K Geissler, Andreas A Schnitzbauer, Carl Zülke, Philipp E Lamby, Andrea Proneth, Christophe Duvoux, Patrizia Burra, Karl-Walter Jauch, Markus Rentsch, Tom M Ganten and 57 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. PD-L1Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

67 authors.

Edward K Geissler1 Department of Surgery and Section of Experimental Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 2 Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 3 Unite d'Hepatologie et de Transplantation Hepatique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor, Service d'Hepatologie et de Gastroenterologie, Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne, Paris, France. 4 Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Gastroenterologiche (DiSCOG), Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy. 5 Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral, Transplantations- Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München-Großhadern, München, Germany. 6 Innere Medizin IV, Sektion Lebertransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 7 Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefässchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany. 8 Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany. 9 Centro Trapianti Fegato, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS di Milano, Milan, Italy. 10 Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianto Epatico, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy. 11 Alberta Health Services Liver Transplant Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 12 Centre Hépato Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif Cedex, Paris, France. 13 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands. 14 Service de Chirurgie Générale, Hépatique, Endocrinienne, et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 15 Service de Néphrologie-HTA-Dialyse-Transplantation, CHU Toulouse-Rangueil, Toulouse, France. 16 Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 17 Hepatic-Pa
Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Carl Zülke
Philipp E Lamby
Andrea Proneth
Christophe Duvoux
Patrizia Burra
Karl-Walter Jauch
Markus Rentsch
Tom M Ganten
Jan Schmidt
Utz Settmacher
Michael Heise
Giorgio Rossi
Umberto Cillo
Norman Kneteman
René Adam
Bart van Hoek
Philippe Bachellier
Philippe Wolf
Lionel Rostaing
Wolf O Bechstein
Magnus Rizell
James Powell
Ernest Hidalgo
Jean Gugenheim
Heiner Wolters
Jens Brockmann
André Roy
Ingrid Mutzbauer
Angela Schlitt
Susanne Beckebaum
Christian Graeb
Silvio Nadalin
Umberto Valente
Victor Sánchez Turrión
Neville Jamieson
Tim Scholz
Michele Colledan
Fred Fändrich
Thomas Becker
Gunnar Söderdahl
Olivier Chazouillères
Heikki Mäkisalo
Georges-Philippe Pageaux
Rudolf Steininger
Thomas Soliman
Koert P de Jong
Jacques Pirenne
Raimund Margreiter
Johann Pratschke
Antonio D Pinna
Johann Hauss
Stefan Schreiber
Simone Strasser
Jürgen Klempnauer
Roberto I Troisi
Sherrie Bhoori
Jan Lerut
Itxarone Bilbao
Christian G Klein
Alfred Königsrainer
Darius F Mirza
Gerd Otto
Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Peter Neuhaus
Hans J Schlitt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated whether sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation (LTx) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsIn a prospective-randomized open-label international trial, 525 LTx recipients with HCC initially receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-free immunosuppression were randomized 4 to 6 weeks after transplantation into a group on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-free immunosuppression (group A: 264 patients) or a group incorporating sirolimus (group B: 261). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted after 8 years. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint.

resultsRecurrence-free survival was 64.5% in group A and 70.2% in group B at study end, this difference was not significant (P = 0.28; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62; 1.15). In a planned analysis of RFS rates at yearly intervals, group B showed better outcomes 3 years after transplantation (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00). Similarly, OS (P = 0.21; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13) was not statistically better in group B at study end, but yearly analyses showed improvement out to 5 years (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00). Interestingly, subgroup (Milan Criteria-based) analyses revealed that low-risk, rather than high-risk, patients benefited most from sirolimus; furthermore, younger recipients (age ≤60) also benefited, as well sirolimus monotherapy patients. Serious adverse event numbers were alike in groups A (860) and B (874).

conclusionsSirolimus in LTx recipients with HCC does not improve long-term RFS beyond 5 years. However, a RFS and OS benefit is evident in the first 3 to 5 years, especially in low-risk patients. This trial provides the first high-level evidence base for selecting immunosuppression in LTx recipients with HCC.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAdultAgedAge FactorsAustraliaCanadaCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationEuropeFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIntention to Treat AnalysisKaplan-Meier EstimateImmunosuppressive AgentsMTOR protein, humanSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID26555945
PMCPMC4683033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.