Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26555605›Full record

Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2016

Renal Scarring in the Randomized Intervention for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) Trial.

Tej K Mattoo, Russell W Chesney, Saul P Greenfield, Alejandro Hoberman, Ron Keren, Ranjiv Mathews, Lisa Gravens-Mueller, Anastasia Ivanova, Myra A Carpenter, Marva Moxey-Mims and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for primary vesicoureteric reflux.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Urinary tract infections in children.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on urinary tract infection recurrence in children Rapid review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tej K MattooDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material tmattoo@med.wayne.edu.
Russell W ChesneyDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Saul P GreenfieldDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Alejandro HobermanDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Ron KerenDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Ranjiv MathewsDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Lisa Gravens-MuellerDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Anastasia IvanovaDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Myra A CarpenterDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Marva Moxey-MimsDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Massoud MajdDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Harvey A ZiessmanDue to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
RIVUR Trial Investigators
Wayne State University · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Randomized Intervention for Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR)U01DK074059 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARPENTER, MYRA A. · 2005 to 2012
$11.3M
POET Study: Clinical Trial of Girls with RefluxU01DK074063 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI GREENFIELD, SAUL PHILIP · 2005 to 2012
$5.0M
RIVUR - Randomized Intervention for Children with Vesicoureteral RefluxU01DK074053 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOBERMAN, ALEJANDRO · 2005 to 2012
$4.3M
RIVUR StudyU01DK074062 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATTOO, TEJ K · 2005 to 2012
$4.0M
Randomized Intervention for VesicolUreteral Reflux (RIVUR) StudyU01DK074064 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI KEREN, RON · 2005 to 2012
$2.8M
Randomized Intervention for Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (RIVUR) TrialU01DK074082 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, MING-HSIEN · 2005 to 2012
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074053NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK074053NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074059NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074062NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074063NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074064NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK074064NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe main objectives of the Randomized Intervention for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux (RIVUR) trial were to evaluate the role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal scarring in children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We present a comprehensive evaluation of renal scarring outcomes in RIVUR trial participants. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 607 children aged 2-71 months with grade 1-4 VUR diagnosed after a first or second febrile or symptomatic UTI. Study participants received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo and were followed for 2 years. Renal scarring was evaluated by baseline and follow-up (99m)technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scans that were reviewed independently by two blinded reference radiologists.

resultsAt the end of the study, 58 (10%) of 599 children and 63 (5%) of 1197 renal units had renal scarring. New renal scarring did not differ between the prophylaxis and placebo groups (6% versus 7%, respectively). Children with renal scarring were significantly older (median age, 26 versus 11 months; P=0.01), had a second UTI before enrollment (odds ratio [OR], 2.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.38 to 5.92), were more likely to be Hispanic (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.13 to 4.34), and had higher grades of VUR (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.56 to 5.0). The proportion of new scars in renal units with grade 4 VUR was significantly higher than in units with no VUR (OR, 24.2; 95% CI, 6.4 to 91.2).

conclusionsSignificantly more renal scarring was seen in relatively older children and in those with a second episode of febrile or symptomatic UTI before randomization. Preexisting and new renal scars occurred significantly more in renal units with grade 4 VUR than in those with low-grade or no VUR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis did not decrease the risk of renal scarring.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsChild, PreschoolCicatrixFemaleHumansInfantKidney DiseasesMaleRecurrenceUrinary Tract InfectionsVesico-Ureteral RefluxAnti-Infective Agentsanti-infective agentschildhumanskidneyrandom allocationreflux nephropathyrenal scarringtrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination urinary tract infectionsvesico-ureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID26555605
PMCPMC4702233
OpenAlexW2227285940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.