Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26555455›Full record

ReviewClinical chemistry2016

Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Evaluation.

Demian R Ifa, Livia S Eberlin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative assessment of tumor margins during glioma resection by desorption electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lipidomic profiling of endometrial cancer using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Demian R IfaDepartment of Chemistry, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada;
Livia S EberlinDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. liviase@utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USYork University · CA

Funding

Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis of Human CancersK99CA190783 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIAVINATO EBERLIN, LIVIA · 2015 to 2015
$133k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA190783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a clinical need for new technologies that would enable rapid disease diagnosis based on diagnostic molecular signatures. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry has revolutionized the means by which molecular information can be obtained from tissue samples in real time and with minimal sample pretreatment. New developments in ambient ionization techniques applied to clinical research suggest that ambient ionization mass spectrometry will soon become a routine medical tool for tissue diagnosis. CONTENT: This review summarizes the main developments in ambient ionization techniques applied to tissue analysis, with focus on desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, probe electrospray ionization, touch spray, and rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. We describe their applications to human cancer research and surgical margin evaluation, highlighting integrated approaches tested for ex vivo and in vivo human cancer tissue analysis. We also discuss the challenges for clinical implementation of these tools and offer perspectives on the future of the field. SUMMARY: A variety of studies have showcased the value of ambient ionization mass spectrometry for rapid and accurate cancer diagnosis. Small molecules have been identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers, including metabolites, fatty acids, and glycerophospholipids. Statistical analysis allows tissue discrimination with high accuracy rates (>95%) being common. This young field has challenges to overcome before it is ready to be broadly accepted as a medical tool for cancer diagnosis. Growing research in new, integrated ambient ionization mass spectrometry technologies and the ongoing improvements in the existing tools make this field very promising for future translation into the clinic.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26555455
PMCPMC5315420
OpenAlexW2184246862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.