Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26555354›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2017

Hippocampus Contributions to Food Intake Control: Mnemonic, Neuroanatomical, and Endocrine Mechanisms.

Scott E Kanoski, Harvey J Grill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The critical role of gut-brain signalling in eating behaviour and obesity.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Top-down regulation of ingestive behavior fragmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott E KanoskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: kanoski@usc.edu.
Harvey J GrillDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

NEURAL HIERARCHY IN THE MODULATION OF INGESTIVE BEHAVIORR01DK021397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRILL, HARVEY J, HAYES, MATTHEW R · 1986 to 2021
$8.8M
Higher-Order Neural Control of Food IntakeR01DK104897 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANOSKI, SCOTT EDWARD · 2015 to 2024
$4.3M
Neural Hierarchy in the Modulation of Ingestive BehaviorR56DK021397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRILL, HARVEY J · 2008 to 2008
$434k
Food intake control by leptin signaling in the hippocampusK01DK097147 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANOSKI, SCOTT EDWARD · 2013 to 2015
$284k
Neuropeptidergic control of environmental stimulus-driven feeding behaviorR03DK102478 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANOSKI, SCOTT EDWARD · 2014 to 2015
$165k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK097147NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK021397NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104897NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK102478NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK021397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food intake is a complex behavior that can occur or cease to occur for a multitude of reasons. Decisions about where, when, what, and how much to eat are not merely reflexive responses to food-relevant stimuli or to changes in energy status. Rather, feeding behavior is modulated by various contextual factors and by previous experiences. The data reviewed here support the perspective that neurons in multiple hippocampal subregions constitute an important neural substrate linking the external context, the internal context, and mnemonic and cognitive information to control both appetitive and ingestive behavior. Feeding behavior is heavily influenced by hippocampal-dependent mnemonic functions, including episodic meal-related memories and conditional learned associations between food-related stimuli and postingestive consequences. These mnemonic processes are undoubtedly influenced by both external and internal factors relating to food availability, location, and physiological energy status. The afferent and efferent neuroanatomical connectivity of the subregions of the hippocampus is reviewed with regard to the integration of visuospatial and olfactory sensory information (the external context) with endocrine and gastrointestinal interoceptive stimuli (the internal context). Also discussed are recent findings demonstrating that peripherally derived endocrine signals act on receptors in hippocampal neurons to reduce (leptin, glucagon-like peptide-1) or increase (ghrelin) food intake and learned food reward-driven responding, thereby highlighting endocrine and neuropeptidergic signaling in hippocampal neurons as a novel substrate of importance in the higher-order regulation of feeding behavior.

Indexed as

EatingMemory, EpisodicAnimalsAssociation LearningFeeding BehaviorGhrelinGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HippocampusHumansInteroceptionLeptinNeuronsGhrelinGlucagon-Like Peptide 1LeptinFeedingLearningMemoryObesityRewardVentral hippocampus

Identifiers

PMID26555354
PMCPMC4809793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.