ReviewAnnals of botany2015
Plants and climate change: complexities and surprises.
Review in Annals of botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
157 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Untangling the Complexity of Climate Change Effects on Plant Reproductive Traits and Pollinators: A Systematic Global Synthesis.Global change biology · 2025Pooled it
- Global systematic review with meta-analysis shows that warming effects on terrestrial plant biomass allocation are influenced by precipitation and mycorrhizal association.Nature communications · 2022Pooled it
- Seed ecology of European mesic meadows.Annals of botany · 2022Pooled it
- Cumulative and Legacy Effects of Irrigation on Growth, Physiology, and Gene Expression inPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Conservation and Targeted Wild Tending ofBiology · 2026Article
- The incredible vulnerability that reproduction poses for plant species in a warming world.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Environmental Association Analyses in Plants and the Influence of Methodological Decisions.Molecular ecology · 2026Review
- Climate-Driven Range Shift of the Medicinal HerbBiology · 2026Article
- Species-specific thermal thresholds for postdispersal embryo growth in Apiaceae.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Leveraging Genetic Diversity for Abiotic Stress Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Microbial allies against drought stress: an optimized screening method to improve seedling survival for forest restorations.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Impacts of Climate Change on the Distribution of Suitable Habitat for InvasiveEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Indigenous knowledge on the uses and conservation of medicinal plants in Namutumba District, Eastern Uganda.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- From wild shrub to cultivated host: a genetic roadmap for enhancing lac production inFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Evaluating the vulnerability of critical early life stages in plants during heat extremes.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
- Predicting the potential suitable habitats of Rosa roxburghii and its key pest Grapholita molesta in China using the MaxEnt Model.PloS one · 2026Article
- Floodplain Forests Are Sensitive to Salt-Intrusion During Summer Droughts When Dominated byEstuaries and coasts : journal of the Estuarine Research Federation · 2026Article
- Drought stress differentially suppresses growth and triggers antioxidant and anthocyanin pathways in Brassica oleracea (C3) and Echinochloa crusgallii (C4).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Predicting Rapid, Climate-Driven Shifts in North American Habitat Suitability for the Purple Pitcher Plant (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnthropogenic climate change (ACC) will influence all aspects of plant biology over coming decades. Many changes in wild species have already been well-documented as a result of increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations, warming climate and changing precipitation regimes. A wealth of available data has allowed the use of meta-analyses to examine plant-climate interactions on more sophisticated levels than before. These analyses have revealed major differences in plant response among groups, e.g. with respect to functional traits, taxonomy, life-history and provenance. Interestingly, these meta-analyses have also exposed unexpected mismatches between theory, experimental, and observational studies. SCOPE: We reviewed the literature on species' responses to ACC, finding ∼42 % of 4000 species studied globally are plants (primarily terrestrial). We review impacts on phenology, distributions, ecophysiology, regeneration biology, plant-plant and plant-herbivore interactions, and the roles of plasticity and evolution. We focused on apparent deviations from expectation, and highlighted cases where more sophisticated analyses revealed that unexpected changes were, in fact, responses to ACC.
conclusionsWe found that conventionally expected responses are generally well-understood, and that it is the aberrant responses that are now yielding greater insight into current and possible future impacts of ACC. We argue that inconclusive, unexpected, or counter-intuitive results should be embraced in order to understand apparent disconnects between theory, prediction, and observation. We highlight prime examples from the collection of papers in this Special Issue, as well as general literature. We found use of plant functional groupings/traits had mixed success, but that some underutilized approaches, such as Grime's C/S/R strategies, when incorporated, have improved understanding of observed responses. Despite inherent difficulties, we highlight the need for ecologists to conduct community-level experiments in systems that replicate multiple aspects of ACC. Specifically, we call for development of coordinating experiments across networks of field sites, both natural and man-made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.