SynthesisPloS one2015
Do Patients Want to Die at Home? A Systematic Review of the UK Literature, Focused on Missing Preferences for Place of Death.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reasons for patients in high income countries accessing hospital care while receiving specialist community palliative care: A systematic review and meta-ethnography.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- What is the impact of clinically assisted hydration in the last days of life? A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2021Pooled it
- Are the MORECare guidelines on reporting of attrition in palliative care research populations appropriate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC palliative care · 2020Pooled it
- End-of-life planning with frail patients attending general practice: an exploratory prospective cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Trial
- Intensive care decision-making, survival and dying well: a mixed methods study with people who have been intensive care patients.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- "I tell you what it's the hardest job": the experiences of family carers providing support for people with dementia at home in the last year of life.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Is home always the best place to live? Preferences for place of residence and long-term care among the community-dwelling oldest old in Finland.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on the Communication Challenges When Discussing Palliative Sedation: A Qualitative Study Across Eight European Countries.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Social determinants of where people die: A study of moderators and mediators using linked UK Census and mortality data.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Unveiling End-of-Life Disparities in Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease: A 22-Year Analysis of the CDC-WONDER Database.Cureus · 2024Article
- Place of Death for Adults Receiving Specialist Palliative Care in Their Last 3 Months of Life: Factors Associated With Preferred Place, Actual Place, and Place of Death Congruence.Journal of palliative care · 2024Article
- Article
- The ideal and the real: Patient and bereaved family caregiver perspectives on the significance of place of death.Death studies · 2024Article
- Factors Related to the Choice of Place of Death in Deceased Patients due to Cancer from 2011 to 2017 with Hospitalization Background in Firoozgar Hospital.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation.Palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Socio-economic determinants for the place of last care: results from the acute palliative care unit of a large comprehensive cancer center in a high-income country in Europe.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Improving paramedic responses for patients dying at home: a theory of change-based approach.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Deaths at home, area-based deprivation and the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of mortality data across four nations.Palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Death place and palliative outcome indicators in patients under palliative home care service: an observational study.BMC palliative care · 2023Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-of-life care policy has a focus on enabling patients to die in their preferred place; this is believed for most to be home. This review assesses patient preferences for place of death examining: the extent of unreported preferences, the importance of patient factors (place of care and health diagnosis) and who reports preferences. METHODS AND
findingsSystematic literature review of 7 electronic databases, grey literature, backwards citations from included studies and Palliative Medicine hand search. Included studies published between 2000-2015, reporting original, quantifiable results of adult UK preferences for place of death. Of 10826 articles reviewed, 61 met the inclusion criteria. Summary charts present preferences for place of death by health diagnosis, where patients were asked and who reported the preference. These charts are recalculated to include 'missing data,' the views of those whose preferences were not asked, expressed or reported or absent in studies. Missing data were common. Across all health conditions when missing data were excluded the majority preference was for home: when missing data were included, it was not known what proportion of patients with cancer, non-cancer or multiple conditions preferred home. Patients, family proxies and public all expressed a majority preference for home when missing data were excluded: when included, it was not known what proportion of patients or family proxies preferred home. Where patients wished to die was related to where they were asked their preference. Missing data calculations are limited to 'reported' data.
conclusionsIt is unknown what proportion of patients prefers to die at home or elsewhere. Reported preferences for place of death often exclude the views of those with no preference or not asked: when 'missing data' are included, they supress the proportion of preferences for all locations. Caution should be exercised if asserting that most patients prefer to die at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.