Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26555069›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Neurological Response to cART vs. cART plus Integrase Inhibitor and CCR5 Antagonist Initiated during Acute HIV.

Victor G Valcour, Serena S Spudich, Napapon Sailasuta, Nittaya Phanuphak, Sukalaya Lerdlum, James L K Fletcher, Eugene D M B Kroon, Linda L Jagodzinski, Isabel E Allen, Collin L Adams and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Neurological Complications of HIV Infection.Current infectious disease reports · 2017
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor G ValcourDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Serena S SpudichDepartment of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Napapon SailasutaHuntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Nittaya PhanuphakSouth East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sukalaya LerdlumFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
James L K FletcherSouth East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Eugene D M B KroonSouth East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Linda L JagodzinskiUnited States Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Isabel E AllenDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Collin L AdamsDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Peeriya PrueksakaewSouth East Asia Research Collaboration with Hawaii, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bonnie M SlikeUnited States Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Joanna M HellmuthDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Jerome H KimUnited States Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Jintanat AnanworanichFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
SEARCH 010/RV 254 Study Group
University of California, San Francisco · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THChulalongkorn University · THHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USHuntington Medical Research Institutes · USYale University · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Research Fellowship in Alzheimer’s disease and Related DementiasT32AG023481 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BRUCE L MILLER, HOWARD J ROSEN · 2005 to 2026
$7.4M
Long-Term CNS Consequences of Treatment During Acute InfectionR01MH095613 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SPUDICH, SERENA S, VALCOUR, VICTOR · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
Central Nervous System Effects in Acute HIV SeroconversionR21MH086341 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VALCOUR, VICTOR · 2009 to 2010
$367k
Intramural NIH HHSNIA NIH HHS T32 AG023481NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095613NIMH NIH HHS R01MH095613NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH086341NIMH NIH HHS R21MH086341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare central nervous system (CNS) outcomes in participants treated during acute HIV infection with standard combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) vs. cART plus integrase inhibitor and CCR5 antagonist (cART+).

design24-week randomized open-label prospective evaluation.

methodParticipants were evaluated then randomized to initiate cART (efavirenz, tenofovir, and either emtricitabine or lamivudine) vs. cART+ (cART plus raltegravir and maraviroc) during acute HIV and re-evaluated at 4, 12 and 24 weeks. We examined plasma and CSF cytokines, HIV RNA levels, neurological and neuropsychological findings, and brain MRS across groups and compared to healthy controls.

resultsAt baseline, 62 participants were in Fiebig stages I-V. Randomized groups were similar for mean age (27 vs. 25, p = 0.137), gender (each 94% male), plasma log10 HIV RNA (5.4 vs. 5.6, p = 0.382), CSF log10 HIV RNA (2.35 vs. 3.31, p = 0.561), and estimated duration of HIV (18 vs. 17 days, p = 0.546). Randomized arms did not differ at 24 weeks by any CNS outcome. Combining arms, all measures concurrent with antiretroviral treatment improved, for example, neuropsychological testing (mean NPZ-4 of -0.408 vs. 0.245, p<0.001) and inflammatory markers by MRS (e.g. mean frontal white matter (FWM) choline of 2.92 vs. 2.84, p = 0.045) at baseline and week 24, respectively. Plasma neopterin (p<0.001) and interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) (p = 0.007) remained elevated in participants compared to controls but no statistically significant differences were seen in CSF cytokines compared to controls, despite individual variability among the HIV-infected group.

conclusionsA 24-week course of cART+ improved CNS related outcomes, but was not associated with measurable differences compared to standard cART.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Integrase InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, CCR5Young AdultAnti-HIV AgentsCCR5 protein, humanHIV Integrase InhibitorsReceptors, CCR5

Identifiers

PMID26555069
PMCPMC4640512
OpenAlexW2168529354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.