ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantiles.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing genomic mutation data storage optimization based on the compression of asymmetry of sparsity.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Detection of minor variants in Mycobacterium tuberculosis whole genome sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Rapid genotyping of targeted viral samples using Illumina short-read sequencing data.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNext generation sequencing enables studying heterogeneous populations of viral infections. When the sequencing is done at high coverage depth ("deep sequencing"), low frequency variants can be detected. Here we present QQ-SNV (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qqsnv), a logistic regression classifier model developed for the Illumina sequencing platforms that uses the quantiles of the quality scores, to distinguish true single nucleotide variants from sequencing errors based on the estimated SNV probability. To train the model, we created a dataset of an in silico mixture of five HIV-1 plasmids. Testing of our method in comparison to the existing methods LoFreq, ShoRAH, and V-Phaser 2 was performed on two HIV and four HCV plasmid mixture datasets and one influenza H1N1 clinical dataset.
resultsFor default application of QQ-SNV, variants were called using a SNV probability cutoff of 0.5 (QQ-SNV(D)). To improve the sensitivity we used a SNV probability cutoff of 0.0001 (QQ-SNV(HS)). To also increase specificity, SNVs called were overruled when their frequency was below the 80(th) percentile calculated on the distribution of error frequencies (QQ-SNV(HS-P80)). When comparing QQ-SNV versus the other methods on the plasmid mixture test sets, QQ-SNV(D) performed similarly to the existing approaches. QQ-SNV(HS) was more sensitive on all test sets but with more false positives. QQ-SNV(HS-P80) was found to be the most accurate method over all test sets by balancing sensitivity and specificity. When applied to a paired-end HCV sequencing study, with lowest spiked-in true frequency of 0.5%, QQ-SNV(HS-P80) revealed a sensitivity of 100% (vs. 40-60% for the existing methods) and a specificity of 100% (vs. 98.0-99.7% for the existing methods). In addition, QQ-SNV required the least overall computation time to process the test sets. Finally, when testing on a clinical sample, four putative true variants with frequency below 0.5% were consistently detected by QQ-SNV(HS-P80) from different generations of Illumina sequencers.
conclusionsWe developed and successfully evaluated a novel method, called QQ-SNV, for highly efficient single nucleotide variant calling on Illumina deep sequencing virology data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.