Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26554522›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Chikungunya vaccines in development.

Michael Schwameis, Nina Buchtele, Patricia Pia Wadowski, Christian Schoergenhofer, Bernd Jilma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of heat-killedFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Development and Application of Treatment for Chikungunya Fever.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael Schwameisa Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Internal Medicine I , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Nina Buchtelea Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Internal Medicine I , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Patricia Pia Wadowskia Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Internal Medicine I , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Christian Schoergenhoferb Internal Medicine I Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Bernd Jilmaa Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Internal Medicine I , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chikungunya virus has become a global health threat, spreading to the industrial world of Europe and the Americas; no treatment or prophylactic vaccine is available. Since the late 1960s much effort has been put into the development of a vaccine, and several heterogeneous strategies have already been explored. Only two candidates have recently qualified to enter clinical phase II trials, a chikungunya virus-like particle-based vaccine and a recombinant live attenuated measles virus-vectored vaccine. This review focuses on the current status of vaccine development against chikungunya virus in humans and discusses the diversity of immunization strategies, results of recent human trials and promising vaccine candidates.

Indexed as

Chikungunya FeverClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDrug DiscoveryGlobal HealthHumansViral VaccinesViral VaccinesChikungunyaclinical trialslive virus vaccinemeasles virusreviewvirus-like particles

Identifiers

PMID26554522
PMCPMC4964651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.