ArticleClinical rheumatology2016
Assessment of nailfold capillaries with a handheld dermatoscope may discriminate the extent of organ involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of short courses on nailfold capillaroscopy in obtaining abilities for the identification of microvasculopathy in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023Article
- [Nailfold capillaroscopy-Principles and clinical application].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2022Article
- Advances in nailfold capillaroscopic analysis in systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2018Review
- Risk association between scleroderma disease characteristics, periodontitis, and tooth loss.Clinical rheumatology · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate whether nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) patterns assessed through an in-office handheld dermatoscope may reflect the extent of disease severity in systemic sclerosis (SSc). NFC patterns were evaluated with a non-contact, polarized light dermatoscope in 40 consecutive patients with SSc and graded in sequence as 0 = normal, 1 = early, 2 = active, or 3 = late patterns. Disease severity was measured according to a modified Medsger severity scale (MSS). For comparisons, patients were grouped in tertiles according to disease severity, and a numerical correlation between the NFC patterns and the composite MSS score was assessed. Twenty patients had normal or early NFC patterns, most of them (17 individuals, 85 %) having low to moderate disease severity. In contrast, 18 out of 20 (90 %) patients with active or late NFC patterns had moderate to high disease severity. Accordingly, patients with normal/early NFC patterns had a median MSS score of 4 (interquartile range (IQR), 3-5) as compared with 7 (4-8; P = 0.02) in those with active/late patterns. A Spearman's rho coefficient of 0.45 (95 % CI, 0.15-0.67; P = 0.003) was found between the graded scale of NFC patterns and the composite MSS score. A handheld dermatoscope is useful to visualize the NFC patterns in SSc patients, and it is efficient enough to reflect the extent of disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.