Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26554038›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Unlocking the early fossil record of the arthropod central nervous system.

Gregory D Edgecombe, Xiaoya Ma, Nicholas J Strausfeld

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A giant stem-group chaetognath.Science advances · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Developmental processes in Ediacara macrofossils.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The nervous and visual systems of onychophorans and tardigrades: learning about arthropod evolution from their closest relatives.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genealogical correspondence of a forebrain centre implies an executive brain in the protostome-deuterostome bilaterian ancestor.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  18. Early animal evolution and the origins of nervous systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  19. Introduction to 'Origin and evolution of the nervous system'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gregory D EdgecombeDepartment of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK g.edgecombe@nhm.ac.uk.
Xiaoya MaDepartment of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Yunnan Key Laboratory for Palaebiology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, People's Republic of China.
Nicholas J StrausfeldDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1115-1774
Natural History Museum · GBUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extant panarthropods (euarthropods, onychophorans and tardigrades) are hallmarked by stunning morphological and taxonomic diversity, but their central nervous systems (CNS) are relatively conserved. The timing of divergences of the ground pattern CNS organization of the major panarthropod clades has been poorly constrained because of a scarcity of data from their early fossil record. Although the CNS has been documented in three-dimensional detail in insects from Cenozoic ambers, it is widely assumed that these tissues are too prone to decay to withstand other styles of fossilization or geologically older preservation. However, Cambrian Burgess Shale-type compressions have emerged as sources of fossilized brains and nerve cords. CNS in these Cambrian fossils are preserved as carbon films or as iron oxides/hydroxides after pyrite in association with carbon. Experiments with carcasses compacted in fine-grained sediment depict preservation of neural tissue for a more prolonged temporal window than anticipated by decay experiments in other media. CNS and compound eye characters in exceptionally preserved Cambrian fossils predict divergences of the mandibulate and chelicerate ground patterns by Cambrian Stage 3 (ca 518 Ma), a dating that is compatible with molecular estimates for these splits.

Indexed as

FossilsAnimalsArthropodsCentral Nervous SystemPhylogenyArthropodabrainsBurgess ShaleCambrianChengjiang

Identifiers

PMID26554038
PMCPMC4650122
OpenAlexW2190005530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.