Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553926›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2015

Bub3-BubR1-dependent sequestration of Cdc20Fizzy at DNA breaks facilitates the correct segregation of broken chromosomes.

Nicolas Derive, Cedric Landmann, Emilie Montembault, Marie-Charlotte Claverie, Priscillia Pierre-Elies, Damien Goutte-Gattat, Nabila Founounou, Derek McCusker, Anne Royou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mechanisms driving acentric chromosome transmission.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas DeriveUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Cedric LandmannUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Emilie MontembaultUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Marie-Charlotte ClaverieUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Priscillia Pierre-EliesUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Damien Goutte-GattatUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Nabila FounounouUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Derek McCuskerUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France.
Anne RoyouUniversité de Bordeaux, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Européen de Chimie et Biologie, Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5095, 33607 Pessac, France a.royou@iecb.u-bordeaux.fr.
Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires · FRInstitut Européen de Chimie et Biologie · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of DNA double-strand breaks during mitosis is particularly challenging for the cell, as it produces broken chromosomes lacking a centromere. This situation can cause genomic instability resulting from improper segregation of the broken fragments into daughter cells. We recently uncovered a process by which broken chromosomes are faithfully transmitted via the BubR1-dependent tethering of the two broken chromosome ends. However, the mechanisms underlying BubR1 recruitment and function on broken chromosomes were largely unknown. We show that BubR1 requires interaction with Bub3 to localize on the broken chromosome fragments and to mediate their proper segregation. We also find that Cdc20, a cofactor of the E3 ubiquitin ligase anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), accumulates on DNA breaks in a BubR1 KEN box-dependent manner. A biosensor for APC/C activity demonstrates a BubR1-dependent local inhibition of APC/C around the segregating broken chromosome. We therefore propose that the Bub3-BubR1 complex on broken DNA inhibits the APC/C locally via the sequestration of Cdc20, thus promoting proper transmission of broken chromosomes.

Indexed as

AnaphaseAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAnimalsCdc20 ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomesDipteraDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSpindle ApparatusUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeBub3 protein, DrosophilaBubR1 protein, DrosophilaCdc20 ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID26553926
PMCPMC4639866
OpenAlexW2267929441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.