Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553895›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2015

Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays.

Timothy C Guetterman, Michael D Fetters, John W Creswell

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 739 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
739citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05490004 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating an Educational Intervention for Improving Provider Recognition and Response to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Experienced by Veterans and Their Families - A Mixed Method Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsDomestic Violence, Veterans Family, Veterans, Child MaltreatmentArmsViolence, Evidence, Guidance, Action Project (VEGA) Education Intervention
NCT05490121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating an Educational Intervention for Improving Residents' Recognition and Response to Child Maltreatment - A Mixed Method Acceptability and Feasibility Study With a Pilot Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled84ConditionsDomestic Violence, Child Maltreatment, Pediatric ALL, PsychiatryArmsViolence, Evidence, Guidance, Action Project (VEGA) Education Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

739 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

679 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy C GuettermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan tguetter@umich.edu.
Michael D FettersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
John W CreswellDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles.

methodsWe searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis.

resultsThe most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights.

conclusionsJoint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.

Indexed as

Audiovisual AidsQualitative ResearchResearch DesignStatistics as TopicBiomedical ResearchPeriodicals as Topicdata displayintegrative analysismethodologymultimethod researchqualitativequantitativestudy design

Identifiers

PMID26553895
PMCPMC4639381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.