Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553721›Full record

ArticleCirculation2015

Correction.

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the article by Burke et al, "Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association," which published ahead of print August 13, 2015, and appeared in the September 22, 2015, issue of the journal (Circulation. 2015;132:1157-1213. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000232), several corrections were needed.1. On page 1203, in the first column, last paragraph, the second sentence read, "Because medication may be a component of the treatment, we also searched for meditation adherence." It has been changed to read, "Because medication may be a component of the treatment, we also searched for medication adherence." 2. On page 1204, in the second column, third complete paragraph, the second sentence read, "As with any other product that claims to improve health, groups will want to answers to certain questions…." It has been changed to read, "As with any other product that claims to improve health, groups will want answers to certain questions…."3. On page 1204, in the second column, last paragraph, the fourth sentence read, "However, the responsibility for generating evidence should not fall solely only on the product developers." It has been changed to read, "However, the responsibility for generating evidence should not fall solely on the product developers." These corrections have been made to the print version and to the current online version of the article, which is available at http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/132/12/1157.full

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.