Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553532›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2016

Estimation of interaction effects using pooled biospecimens in a case-control study.

Michelle R Danaher, Paul S Albert, Aninyda Roy, Enrique F Schisterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle R DanaherEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
Paul S AlbertEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
Aninyda RoyDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Enrique F SchistermanEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.

Funding

ROC Curve MethodologyZIAHD008761 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE F. · 2009 to 2021
$2.1M
ROC Curve MethodologyZ01HD008761 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE · 2003 to 2008
$180k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008761NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201100002CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201100002GPHS HHS 1 HHSN27500001PHS HHS HHSN275200403394CPHS HHS HHSN275201100002I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pooling, or physically mixing biospecimens, prior to evaluating biomarkers dramatically reduces biomarker evaluation cost, reduces the quantity of biospecimens required of each individual, and may reduce the percentage of laboratory measurements below the lower limit of detection. Motivated by a case-control study on miscarriage (binary outcome) and cytokines (continuous exposures), we are interested in estimating parameters in a logistic regression, where individuals with the same disease status (with or without a miscarriage) are paired and their pooled cytokine concentrations are assessed. Previous research has proposed a set-based logistic model to evaluate the relationship between a disease and pooled exposures. While the set-based logistic model is very useful for estimating main effects, it cannot estimate interactions of continuous exposures when both are measured in pools. Therefore, we propose using the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm to obtain estimators of all parameters in logistic regression model, including interactions effects. Using a simulation study, we present comparisons of efficiency under different scenarios where exposures have been measured in pools and individually. Our simulations show that randomly sampling half of the available biospecimens has less efficiency than pooling pairs of biospecimens stratified by disease status. The EM algorithm provides a method for estimating interaction effects when biospecimens have already been pooled for other reasons such as the gain in efficiency for estimating main effects demonstrated by previous research. This manuscript demonstrates that the EM algorithm offers a promising approach to estimate interaction effects of pooled biospecimens.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesAbortion, SpontaneousAlgorithmsBiasBiomarkersCytokinesHumansLimit of DetectionLogistic ModelsModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodBiomarkersCytokinescytokinesexpectation maximizationlogistic regressionpooling designsskewed biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26553532
PMCPMC4821703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.