ArticlePharmaceutical research2016
Assessment of Interspecies Differences in Drug-Induced QTc Interval Prolongation in Cynomolgus Monkeys, Dogs and Humans.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Editorial: Model organisms in predictive toxicology 2022.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of moxifloxacin in canine and non-human primate telemetry assays: Comparison of QTc interval prolongation by timepoint and concentration-QTc analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Clinical Trials in a Dish: A Perspective on the Coming Revolution in Drug Development.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2018Review
- Complex Bayesian Modeling Workflows Encoding and Execution Made Easy With a Novel WinBUGS Plugin of the Drug Disease Model Resources Interoperability Framework.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2018Article
- Standard Electrocardiographic Data from Capuchin Monkeys (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2018Article
- Using vaccine Immunostimulation/Immunodynamic modelling methods to inform vaccine dose decision-making.NPJ vaccines · 2018Article
- Using Data from Macaques To Predict Gamma Interferon Responses after Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vaccination in Humans: a Proof-of-Concept Study of Immunostimulation/Immunodynamic Modeling Methods.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017Article
- Characterizing QT interval prolongation in early clinical development: a case study with methadone.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2017Article
- Translating QT interval prolongation from conscious dogs to humans.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Levofloxacin-Induced QTc Prolongation Depends on the Time of Drug Administration.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe selection of the most suitable animal species and subsequent translation of the concentration-effect relationship to humans are critical steps for accurate assessment of the pro-arrhythmic risk of candidate molecules. The objective of this investigation was to assess quantitatively the differences in the QTc prolonging effects of moxifloxacin between cynomolgus monkeys, dogs and humans. The impact of interspecies differences is also illustrated for a new candidate molecule. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Pharmacokinetic data and ECG recordings from pre-clinical protocols in monkeys and dogs and from a phase I trial in healthy subjects were identified for the purpose of this analysis. A previously established Bayesian model describing the combined effect of heart rate, circadian variation and drug effect on the QT interval was used to describe the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. The probability of a ≥ 10 ms increase in QT was derived as measure of the pro-arrhythmic effect. KEY
resultsFor moxifloxacin, the concentrations associated with a 50% probability of QT prolongation ≥ 10 ms (Cp50) varied from 20.3 to 6.4 and 2.6 μM in dogs, monkeys and humans, respectively. For NCE05, these values were 0.4 μM vs 2.0 μM for monkeys and humans, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings reveal significant interspecies differences in the QT-prolonging effect of moxifloxacin. In addition to the dissimilarity in pharmacokinetics across species, it is likely that differences in pharmacodynamics also play an important role. It appears that, regardless of the animal model used, a translation function is needed to predict concentration-effect relationships in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.