Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553346›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2016

The Dietary Components Carnosic Acid and Carnosol as Neuroprotective Agents: a Mechanistic View.

Marcos Roberto de Oliveira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Abietane Diterpenes fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcos Roberto de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Departamento de Química (DQ), Instituto de Ciências Exatas e da Terra (ICET), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa, 2367, CEP 78060-900, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil. mrobioq@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carnosic acid (CA) and carnosol are the major diterpenes found in Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary), a culinary spice. CA and carnosol account for over 90 % of its anti-oxidant activity in rosemary leaves. The diterpenes exert anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-carcinogenic activities, and present neuroprotective effects in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models. In some cases, CA exerted protective effects upon neuronal cells more intensely than resveratrol or sulforaphane. Therefore, CA and carnosol demonstrate a potential pharmacological role for rosemary diterpenes in ameliorating mammalian brain redox status, among other parameters, as for instance the modulation of neuroinflammation. The aim of this review is to discuss the biological effects of CA and carnosol on neuronal and glial cells with focus on the mechanism of action of such diterpenes.

Indexed as

DietAbietanesAnimalsHumansNeurogliaNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsAbietanescarnosolNeuroprotective AgentssalvinBrainCarnosic acidCarnosolGliaNeuron

Identifiers

PMID26553346
OpenAlexW2245650583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.