Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553337›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016

Defining Appropriate Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors Among Medical Inpatients.

Matt Pappas, Sanjay Jolly, Sandeep Vijan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of proton pump inhibitors and mortality after hip fracture in a nationwide study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Reconsidering a Common Practice: In-Hospital Use of PPIs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Empiricism as Change Agent.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matt PappasVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd., NCRC Bldg. 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. pappasm@umich.edu.
Sanjay JollyThe University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sandeep VijanVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd., NCRC Bldg. 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
Michigan Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used among medical inpatients, both for prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and continuation of outpatient use. While PPIs reduce the risk of UGIB, they also appear to increase the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Depending upon the underlying risks of these conditions and the changes in those risks with PPIs, use of proton-pump inhibitors may lead to a net benefit or net harm among medical inpatients.

objectiveWe aimed to determine the net impact of PPIs on hospital mortality among medical inpatients.

designA microsimulation model, using literature-derived estimates of the risks of UGIB, HAP, and CDI among medical inpatients, along with the changes in risk associated with PPI use for each of these outcomes. The primary outcome was change in inpatient mortality.

participantsSimulated general medical inpatients outside the intensive care unit (ICU). MAIN MEASURE: Change in overall mortality during hospitalization. KEY

resultsNew initiation of PPI therapy led to an increase in hospital mortality in about 90% of simulated patients. Continuation of outpatient PPI therapy on admission led to net increase in hospital mortality in 79% of simulated patients. Results were robust to both one-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses, with net harm occurring in at least two-thirds of patients in all scenarios.

conclusionsFor the majority of medical inpatients outside the ICU, use of PPIs likely leads to a net increase in hospital mortality. Even in patients at particularly high risk of UGIB, only those at the very lowest risk of HCAP and CDI should be considered for prophylactic PPI use. Continuation of outpatient PPIs may also increase expected hospital mortality. Apart from patients with active UGIB, use of PPIs in hospitalized patients should be discouraged.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalClostridium InfectionsGastrointestinal HemorrhageHospital MortalityHumansInpatientsMortalityPneumoniaPre-Exposure ProphylaxisProton Pump InhibitorsRisk FactorsProton Pump Inhibitorshospital medicinemedical decision makingmodelingsimulation

Identifiers

PMID26553337
PMCPMC4803704
OpenAlexW2099528116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.