ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016
Defining Appropriate Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors Among Medical Inpatients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- A Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
- Proton-pump inhibitors do not influence clinical outcomes in patients withTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Germinant Synergy Facilitates Clostridium difficile Spore Germination under Physiological Conditions.mSphere · 2018Article
- Outcomes From a Pharmacist - led Proton Pump Inhibitor Stewardship Program at a Single Institution.Hospital pharmacy · 2018Article
- The impact of pharmaceutical interventions on the rational use of proton pump inhibitors in a Chinese hospital.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Use of proton pump inhibitors and mortality after hip fracture in a nationwide study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017Article
- Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors and prevalence of disease- and drug-related reasons for gastroprotection-a cross-sectional population-based study.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2017Article
- Reconsidering a Common Practice: In-Hospital Use of PPIs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- Empiricism as Change Agent.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used among medical inpatients, both for prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and continuation of outpatient use. While PPIs reduce the risk of UGIB, they also appear to increase the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Depending upon the underlying risks of these conditions and the changes in those risks with PPIs, use of proton-pump inhibitors may lead to a net benefit or net harm among medical inpatients.
objectiveWe aimed to determine the net impact of PPIs on hospital mortality among medical inpatients.
designA microsimulation model, using literature-derived estimates of the risks of UGIB, HAP, and CDI among medical inpatients, along with the changes in risk associated with PPI use for each of these outcomes. The primary outcome was change in inpatient mortality.
participantsSimulated general medical inpatients outside the intensive care unit (ICU). MAIN MEASURE: Change in overall mortality during hospitalization. KEY
resultsNew initiation of PPI therapy led to an increase in hospital mortality in about 90% of simulated patients. Continuation of outpatient PPI therapy on admission led to net increase in hospital mortality in 79% of simulated patients. Results were robust to both one-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses, with net harm occurring in at least two-thirds of patients in all scenarios.
conclusionsFor the majority of medical inpatients outside the ICU, use of PPIs likely leads to a net increase in hospital mortality. Even in patients at particularly high risk of UGIB, only those at the very lowest risk of HCAP and CDI should be considered for prophylactic PPI use. Continuation of outpatient PPIs may also increase expected hospital mortality. Apart from patients with active UGIB, use of PPIs in hospitalized patients should be discouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.