Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26553326›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Perceptions of Cancer Risk: Differences by Weight Status.

Kerry R Silverman, Pamela A Ohman-Strickland, Allison H Christian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerry R SilvermanDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08903, USA.
Pamela A Ohman-StricklandDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ, USA.
Allison H ChristianDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08903, USA. allison.christian@rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-4233
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Re-entry Supplement to Extended Cancer Education for Longer-term Survivors (EXCELS) In Primary CareR01CA176838 · NCI · RBHS-ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HUDSON, SHAWNA V. · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the strong link between obesity and cancer development, individuals are less likely to identify obesity as a risk factor for cancer than family history. Family history of cancer has been documented to influence perceived risk of developing cancer, yet it is unclear if excess weight impacts cancer risk perceptions. The purpose of this study was to examine absolute and relative risk perceptions for cancer by weight status. Cross-sectional data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's 2011 Health Information National Trends Survey (n = 2585). Demographics, anthropometric data, family history of cancer, health behaviors, and absolute and relative cancer risk perceptions were evaluated. The effect of weight and family history on absolute and relative cancer risk perceptions was analyzed through weighted descriptive and logistic regression analyses. 22.8 and 28.6 % of subjects reported that they were very unlikely/unlikely to develop cancer in their lifetime (absolute risk) and when compared to others their age (relative risk), respectively. Findings indicated differences in risk perceptions between those with and without a family history of cancer (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between BMI categories for absolute cancer risk perceptions despite stratification by family history. Obese subjects were more likely to have an increased relative risk perception of cancer compared to healthy weight subjects (p = 0.0066); this association remained significant when stratified by family history (p = 0.0161). Educating individuals, especially those who are overweight/obese, about the impact of excess weight on cancer risk may improve risk accuracy and promote cancer risk reduction through weight management.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPerceptionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsObesityRisk FactorsCancerObesityRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID26553326
PMCPMC4861687
OpenAlexW2222579873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.