ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transfer learning for T-cell response prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- JASPAR 2026: expansion of transcription factor binding profiles and integration of deep learning models.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Discovery of a non-canonical GRHL1 binding site using deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Widespread effects of DNA methylation and intra-motif dependencies revealed by novel transcription factor binding models.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- DNA-binding properties of the MADS-domain transcription factor SEPALLATA3 and mutant variants characterized by SELEX-seq.Plant molecular biology · 2021Article
- Systematic Evaluation of DNA Sequence Variations onFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- TFBSshape: an expanded motif database for DNA shape features of transcription factor binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Modeling in-vivo protein-DNA binding by combining multiple-instance learning with a hybrid deep neural network.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Allele specific chromatin signals, 3D interactions, and motif predictions for immune and B cell related diseases.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Disentangling transcription factor binding site complexity.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- HOCOMOCO: towards a complete collection of transcription factor binding models for human and mouse via large-scale ChIP-Seq analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- CircularLogo: A lightweight web application to visualize intra-motif dependencies.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Modeling protein-DNA binding via high-throughput in vitro technologies.Briefings in functional genomics · 2017Article
- Combining phylogenetic footprinting with motif models incorporating intra-motif dependencies.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- InMoDe: tools for learning and visualizing intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Scoring Targets of Transcription in Bacteria Rather than Focusing on Individual Binding Sites.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- RCK: accurate and efficient inference of sequence- and structure-based protein-RNA binding models from RNAcompete data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStatistical modeling of transcription factor binding sites is one of the classical fields in bioinformatics. The position weight matrix (PWM) model, which assumes statistical independence among all nucleotides in a binding site, used to be the standard model for this task for more than three decades but its simple assumptions are increasingly put into question. Recent high-throughput sequencing methods have provided data sets of sufficient size and quality for studying the benefits of more complex models. However, learning more complex models typically entails the danger of overfitting, and while model classes that dynamically adapt the model complexity to data have been developed, effective model selection is to date only possible for fully observable data, but not, e.g., within de novo motif discovery.
resultsTo address this issue, we propose a stochastic algorithm for performing robust model selection in a latent variable setting. This algorithm yields a solution without relying on hyperparameter-tuning via massive cross-validation or other computationally expensive resampling techniques. Using this algorithm for learning inhomogeneous parsimonious Markov models, we study the degree of putative higher-order intra-motif dependencies for transcription factor binding sites inferred via de novo motif discovery from ChIP-seq data. We find that intra-motif dependencies are prevalent and not limited to first-order dependencies among directly adjacent nucleotides, but that second-order models appear to be the significantly better choice.
conclusionsThe traditional PWM model appears to be indeed insufficient to infer realistic sequence motifs, as it is on average outperformed by more complex models that take into account intra-motif dependencies. Moreover, using such models together with an appropriate model selection procedure does not lead to a significant performance loss in comparison with the PWM model for any of the studied transcription factors. Hence, we find it worthwhile to recommend that any modern motif discovery algorithm should attempt to take into account intra-motif dependencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.