Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552868›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.

Ralf Eggeling, Teemu Roos, Petri Myllymäki, Ivo Grosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ralf EggelingInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. eggeling@cs.helsinki.fi.
Teemu RoosDepartment of Computer Science, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. teemu.roos@cs.helsinki.fi.
Petri MyllymäkiDepartment of Computer Science, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. petri.myllymaki@cs.helsinki.fi.
Ivo GrosseInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. grosse@informatik.uni-halle.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatistical modeling of transcription factor binding sites is one of the classical fields in bioinformatics. The position weight matrix (PWM) model, which assumes statistical independence among all nucleotides in a binding site, used to be the standard model for this task for more than three decades but its simple assumptions are increasingly put into question. Recent high-throughput sequencing methods have provided data sets of sufficient size and quality for studying the benefits of more complex models. However, learning more complex models typically entails the danger of overfitting, and while model classes that dynamically adapt the model complexity to data have been developed, effective model selection is to date only possible for fully observable data, but not, e.g., within de novo motif discovery.

resultsTo address this issue, we propose a stochastic algorithm for performing robust model selection in a latent variable setting. This algorithm yields a solution without relying on hyperparameter-tuning via massive cross-validation or other computationally expensive resampling techniques. Using this algorithm for learning inhomogeneous parsimonious Markov models, we study the degree of putative higher-order intra-motif dependencies for transcription factor binding sites inferred via de novo motif discovery from ChIP-seq data. We find that intra-motif dependencies are prevalent and not limited to first-order dependencies among directly adjacent nucleotides, but that second-order models appear to be the significantly better choice.

conclusionsThe traditional PWM model appears to be indeed insufficient to infer realistic sequence motifs, as it is on average outperformed by more complex models that take into account intra-motif dependencies. Moreover, using such models together with an appropriate model selection procedure does not lead to a significant performance loss in comparison with the PWM model for any of the studied transcription factors. Hence, we find it worthwhile to recommend that any modern motif discovery algorithm should attempt to take into account intra-motif dependencies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, TheoreticalNucleotide MotifsPosition-Specific Scoring MatricesProtein BindingTranscription FactorsDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26552868
PMCPMC4640111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.