Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552847›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2016

Blunted Endogenous Opioid Release Following an Oral Amphetamine Challenge in Pathological Gamblers.

Inge Mick, Jim Myers, Anna C Ramos, Paul R A Stokes, David Erritzoe, Alessandro Colasanti, Roger N Gunn, Eugenii A Rabiner, Graham E Searle, Adam D Waldman and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Intranasal naloxone rapidly occupies brain mu-opioid receptors in human subjects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Similarities and Differences in Neurobiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in simultaneous PET/MR for imaging neuroreceptor function.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. A Survey of Molecular Imaging of Opioid Receptors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Brain PET Poster Sessions PP01-M01 to PP02-N07.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Article
  18. The role of the opioid system in decision making and cognitive control: A review.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Inge MickCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jim MyersCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anna C RamosCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul R A StokesCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David ErritzoeCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alessandro ColasantiCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Roger N GunnCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Eugenii A RabinerImanova Ltd., Centre for Imaging Sciences, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3612-6687
Graham E SearleImanova Ltd., Centre for Imaging Sciences, London, UK.
Adam D WaldmanDepartment of Imaging, Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
Mark C ParkinDrug Control Centre, Analytical and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Alan D BrailsfordDrug Control Centre, Analytical and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
José C F GaldurózDepartment of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Henrietta Bowden-JonesNational Problem Gambling Clinic, CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Luke ClarkCentre for Gambling Research, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, Vancouver, Canada.
David J NuttCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anne R Lingford-HughesCentre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathological gambling is a psychiatric disorder and the first recognized behavioral addiction, with similarities to substance use disorders but without the confounding effects of drug-related brain changes. Pathophysiology within the opioid receptor system is increasingly recognized in substance dependence, with higher mu-opioid receptor (MOR) availability reported in alcohol, cocaine and opiate addiction. Impulsivity, a risk factor across the addictions, has also been found to be associated with higher MOR availability. The aim of this study was to characterize baseline MOR availability and endogenous opioid release in pathological gamblers (PG) using [(11)C]carfentanil PET with an oral amphetamine challenge. Fourteen PG and 15 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent two [(11)C]carfentanil PET scans, before and after an oral administration of 0.5 mg/kg of d-amphetamine. The change in [(11)C]carfentanil binding between baseline and post-amphetamine scans (ΔBPND) was assessed in 10 regions of interest (ROI). MOR availability did not differ between PG and HV groups. As seen previously, oral amphetamine challenge led to significant reductions in [(11)C]carfentanil BPND in 8/10 ROI in HV. PG demonstrated significant blunting of opioid release compared with HV. PG also showed blunted amphetamine-induced euphoria and alertness compared with HV. Exploratory analysis revealed that impulsivity positively correlated with caudate baseline BPND in PG only. This study provides the first evidence of blunted endogenous opioid release in PG. Our findings are consistent with growing evidence that dysregulation of endogenous opioids may have an important role in the pathophysiology of addictions.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAmphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidAnalysis of VarianceCarbon IsotopesCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleFentanylGamblingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePositron-Emission TomographyAmphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidCarbon IsotopescarfentanilCentral Nervous System StimulantsFentanyl

Identifiers

PMID26552847
PMCPMC4869041
OpenAlexW2205787010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.