Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552835›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2015

Novel Noxipoint Therapy versus Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trials.

Charles C Koo, Ray S Lin, Tyng-Guey Wang, Jau-Yih Tsauo, Pan-Chyr Yang, Chen-Tung Yen, Sandip Biswal

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adhesive pyramidal thorn patches provide pain relief to athletes.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Trial
  3. Sensing acidosis: nociception or sngception?Journal of biomedical science · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles C KooStanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
Ray S LinPain Cure Centre, Palo Alto, CA 94306, U.S.A.
Tyng-Guey WangDepartment of Physical Medicine &Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 100.
Jau-Yih TsauoSchool and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 100.
Pan-Chyr YangCollege of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 100.
Chen-Tung YenDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106.
Sandip BiswalDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Centre, Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As chronic pain affects 115 million people and costs $600B annually in the US alone, effective noninvasive nonpharmacological remedies are desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and the generalisability of Noxipoint therapy (NT), a novel electrotherapy characterised by site-specific stimulation, intensity-and-submodality-specific settings and a immobilization period, for chronic neck and shoulder pain. Ninety-seven heavily pretreated severe chronic neck/shoulder pain patients were recruited; 34 and 44 patients were randomly allocated to different treatment arms in two patient-and-assessor-blinded, randomised controlled studies. The participants received NT or conventional physical therapy including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PT-TENS) for three to six 90-minute sessions. In Study One, NT improved chronic pain (-89.6%, Brief Pain Inventory, p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval), function (+77.4%, range of motion) and quality of life (+88.1%) at follow-up (from 4 weeks to 5 months), whereas PT-TENS resulted in no significant changes in these parameters. Study Two demonstrated similar advantages of NT over PT-TENS and the generalisability of NT. NT-like treatments in a randomised rat study showed a similar reduction in chronic hypersensitivity (-81%, p < 0.01) compared with sham treatments. NT substantially reduces chronic neck and shoulder pain, restores function, and improves quality of life in a sustained manner.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultAnimalsChronic PainFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHyperalgesiaMaleMiddle AgedMyalgiaQuality of LifeRatsShoulder PainTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26552835
PMCPMC4639784
OpenAlexW2220038812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.