Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552792›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Impact of the novel neonicotinoid insecticide Paichongding on bacterial communities in yellow loam and Huangshi soils.

Zhiqiang Cai, Jiangtao Ma, Jing Wang, Jinyan Cai, Guanghua Yang, Xiyue Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhiqiang CaiLaboratory of Applied Microbiology, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering & Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China. zhqcai@cczu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-675X
Jiangtao MaLaboratory of Applied Microbiology, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering & Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China.
Jing WangLaboratory of Applied Microbiology, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering & Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China.
Jinyan CaiLaboratory of Applied Microbiology, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering & Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China.
Guanghua YangLaboratory of Applied Microbiology, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering & Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China.
Xiyue ZhaoLaboratory of Applied Microbiology, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering & Life Science, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China. xyzhao@cczu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insecticides are widely sprayed in modern agriculture for ensuring the crop yield, which could also lead to contamination and insecticide residue in soils. Paichongding (IPP) is a novel neonicotinoid insecticide and was developed recently in China. Soil bacterial community, diversity, and community composition vary widely depending on environmental factors. As for now, little is known about bacterial species thriving, bacterial community diversity, and structure in IPP-spraying soils. In present study, IPP degradation in yellow loam and Huangshi soils was investigated, and bacterial communities and diversity were examined in soil without IPP spray and with IPP spray through pyrosequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicons. The degradation ratio of IPP at 60 days after treatment (DAT) reached 51.22 and 34.01 % in yellow loam and Huangshi soil, respectively. A higher richness of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was found in yellow loam soil (867 OTUs) and Huangshi soil (762 OTUs) without IPP spray while OUTs were relatively low in IPP-spraying soils. The community composition also differed both in phyla and genus level between these two environmental conditions. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes, Chloroflexi, Armatimonadetes, and Chlorobi were stimulated to increase after IPP application, while IPP inhibited the phyla of Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAcidobacteriaActinobacteriaAzabicyclo CompoundsBacteriaChinaInsecticidesProteobacteriaPyridinesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAzabicyclo CompoundsInsecticidespaichongdingPyridinesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilBacterial communityBacterial diversityDegradationPaichongdingPyrosequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.