ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology2015
Therapeutic strategies in eosinophilic esophagitis: Induction, maintenance and refractory disease.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024Review
- Clinico-pathological characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis in Jordanian children.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2022Article
- A case of eosinophilic esophagitis with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 2, including autoimmune gastritis.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Ascites in a 21-year-old man.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Interleukin-Mediated Pendrin Transcriptional Regulation in Airway and Esophageal Epithelia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Correction to: Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019Article
- The role of maintenance therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis: who, why, and how?Journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018Review
- Management of refractory eosinophilic oesophagitis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis and the Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases: Approach to Diagnosis and Management.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease that is increasingly recognized as one of the most common causes of dysphagia and foregut symptoms in adults and children. Topical corticosteroids, elimination diets, and esophageal dilations are effective options for both induction and maintenance therapy in EoE. Current pharmacologic options are being used off-label as no agent has yet been approved by regulatory authorities. Little is known about the natural history of EoE, however, raising controversy regarding the necessity of maintenance and therapy in asymptomatic or treatment-refractory patients. Furthermore, variability in treatment endpoints used in EoE clinical trials makes interpretation and comparability of EoE treatments challenging. Recent validation of a patient-related outcome (PRO) instruments, a histologic scoring tool, and an endoscopic grading system for EoE are significant advances toward establishing consistent treatment endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.