SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2016
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy as a Promising Option for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Single arm Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of osimertinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC: A meta-analysis.International journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of Programmed Death Ligand-1 in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- The mechanism and research progress of PD-1/PD-L1 on immune escape of lung cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- Review
- The efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- Interaction between the microbiome and TP53 in human lung cancer.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Sequential administration of MVA-based vaccines and PD-1/PD-L1-blocking antibodies confers measurable benefits on tumor growth and survival: Preclinical studies with MVA-βGal and MVA-MUC1 (TG4010) in a murine tumor model.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Article
- New advances in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.American journal of translational research · 2018Review
- Evolution of cancer risk assessment and counseling related to psychological, financial and legal implications.Familial cancer · 2016Article
- The efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies showed satisfactory efficacy in treating non-small-cell lung cancer. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the advantage subtypes and best therapeutic modalities of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy on NSCLC. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The pooled ORR, 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR6m), and 1-year overall survival rate (OSR1y) were calculated and compared. 15 trials were included in this meta-analysis. Our analyses demonstrated the pooled ORR of 1st line and 2nd or more line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy were 36.5% (21.9-51.0%) and 17.0% (14.3-19.7%), respectively. While the difference was significant (Z = 3.31, p < 0.001). The pooled ORR for non-squamous and squamous cell lung cancer were 18.5% (16.0-21.1%) and 17.9% (14.4-21.5%), respectively. The difference was not significant (Z = 0.27, p = 0.791). The pooled ORR for PD-L1 positive and negative patients were 29.6% (21.6-37.6%) and 13.5% (10.6-16.3%), respectively. The difference was significant (Z = 4.39, p < 0.001). The PFSR6m for PD-L1 positive and negative NSCLC were 50.0% (40.5-62.3%) and 27.0% (19.2-34.7%). The difference was significant (Z = 3.72, p < 0.001). The OSR1y for PD-L1 positive and negative NSCLC were 66.8% (44.8%-88.9%) and 54.0% (32.6-75.3%). The difference was not significant (Z = 0.77, p = 0.441). Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody can serve as a promising treatment option for NSCLC. Patients with positive PD-L1 expression may benefit more from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. 1st-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy can be chosen as the best modality. Squamous cell lung cancer also benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26552662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.