Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552662›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2016

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy as a Promising Option for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Single arm Meta-Analysis.

Lucheng Zhu, Saisai Jing, Bing Wang, Kan Wu, M A Shenglin, Shirong Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New advances in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.American journal of translational research · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucheng ZhuAffiliated Hangzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Saisai JingHangzhou First People's Hospital, No.261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Bing WangHangzhou First People's Hospital, No.261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, People's Republic of China.
Kan WuHangzhou First People's Hospital, No.261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, People's Republic of China.
M A ShenglinAffiliated Hangzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, People's Republic of China. mashenglin@outlook.com.
Shirong ZhangHangzhou First People's Hospital, No.261, Huansha Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, People's Republic of China. shirley4444@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies showed satisfactory efficacy in treating non-small-cell lung cancer. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the advantage subtypes and best therapeutic modalities of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy on NSCLC. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed through a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The pooled ORR, 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR6m), and 1-year overall survival rate (OSR1y) were calculated and compared. 15 trials were included in this meta-analysis. Our analyses demonstrated the pooled ORR of 1st line and 2nd or more line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy were 36.5% (21.9-51.0%) and 17.0% (14.3-19.7%), respectively. While the difference was significant (Z = 3.31, p < 0.001). The pooled ORR for non-squamous and squamous cell lung cancer were 18.5% (16.0-21.1%) and 17.9% (14.4-21.5%), respectively. The difference was not significant (Z = 0.27, p = 0.791). The pooled ORR for PD-L1 positive and negative patients were 29.6% (21.6-37.6%) and 13.5% (10.6-16.3%), respectively. The difference was significant (Z = 4.39, p < 0.001). The PFSR6m for PD-L1 positive and negative NSCLC were 50.0% (40.5-62.3%) and 27.0% (19.2-34.7%). The difference was significant (Z = 3.72, p < 0.001). The OSR1y for PD-L1 positive and negative NSCLC were 66.8% (44.8%-88.9%) and 54.0% (32.6-75.3%). The difference was not significant (Z = 0.77, p = 0.441). Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody can serve as a promising treatment option for NSCLC. Patients with positive PD-L1 expression may benefit more from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. 1st-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy can be chosen as the best modality. Squamous cell lung cancer also benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorCheckpoint inhibitorMeta-analysisNon-small cell lung cancerPD-1PD-L1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.