Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552330›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2016

Disparities in cervical cancer survival among Asian-American women.

Van T Nghiem, Kalatu R Davies, Wenyaw Chan, Zuber D Mulla, Scott B Cantor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Van T NghiemDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston; Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston.
Kalatu R DaviesDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Wenyaw ChanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston.
Zuber D MullaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso; Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock.
Scott B CantorDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Electronic address: sbcantor@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Technical FeasibilityP01CA082710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MACAULAY, CALUM E · 1999 to 2014
$28.7M
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA082710NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712NCI NIH HHS R25 CA57712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe compared overall survival and influencing factors between Asian-American women as a whole and by subgroup with white women with cervical cancer.

methodsCervical cancer data were from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry; socioeconomic information was from the Area Health Resource File. We used standard tests to compare characteristics between groups; the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test to assess overall survival and compare it between groups; and Cox proportional hazards models to determine the effect of race and other covariates on overall survival (with and/or without age stratification).

resultsBeing 3.3 years older than white women at diagnosis (P < .001), Asian-American women were more likely to be in a spousal relationship, had more progressive disease, and were better off socioeconomically. Women of Filipino, Japanese, and Korean origin had similar clinical characteristics compared to white women. Asian-American women had higher 36- and 60-month survival rates (P = .004 and P = .013, respectively), higher overall survival rates (P = .049), and longer overall survival durations after adjusting for age and other covariates (hazard ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.86). Overall survival differed across age strata between the two racial groups. With the exception of women of Japanese or Korean origin, Asian-American women grouped by geographic origin had better overall survival than white women.

conclusionsAlthough Asian-American women, except those of Japanese or Korean origin, had better overall survival than white women, their older age at cervical cancer diagnosis suggests that they have less access to screening programs.

Indexed as

AsianHealth Status DisparitiesAdenocarcinomaAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSEER ProgramSurvival RateAsian-AmericansCervical cancerEthnicityHealth care disparitiesRaceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26552330
PMCPMC4688093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.