Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26552017›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2016

Facilitating psychosexual adjustment for women undergoing pelvic radiotherapy: pilot of a novel patient psycho-educational resource.

Franchelle Lubotzky, Phyllis Butow, Kathryn Nattress, Caroline Hunt, Susan Carroll, Andrew Comensoli, Shannon Philp, Ilona Juraskova

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of psychoeducation intervention among women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of patient information format on the experience of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  4. Extended duration of dilator use beyond 1 year may reduce vaginal stenosis after intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention after radiotherapy for gynecological cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Franchelle LubotzkySchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Phyllis ButowSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kathryn NattressSydney Cancer Centre, Gynaecologic Oncology Group, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Caroline HuntSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Susan CarrollDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew ComensoliSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Shannon PhilpSydney Cancer Centre, Gynaecologic Oncology Group, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ilona JuraskovaSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis pilot study aimed to obtain feedback on the feasibility, safety and acceptability of a psychosexual rehabilitation booklet developed for women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy (PRT) and to explore women's sexual, informational and supportive care needs post-PRT rehabilitation.

methodsTwenty women treated with PRT for gynaecological or anorectal cancer within the last 5 years, who had received vaginal dilators, provided feedback on the format, content and utility of the booklet and discussed their post-treatment information needs, via a semi-structured phone interview. Women completed standardized (HADS, IES-R) and study-specific scales to characterize psychological status of the sample and to assess participants' booklet knowledge and feedback, respectively.

resultsThe booklet was perceived as very helpful, informative and not distressing, providing additional information to that discussed with clinicians. After reading the booklet, women had good understanding of strategies to reduce the sexual impact of PRT. Many women reported that discussion of sexuality was often avoided during consultations, despite them experiencing distressing sexual experiences and difficulties post-PRT.

conclusionsThis novel resource which addresses an important component of post-pelvic radiation care appears acceptable and highly valued. Findings have highlighted a need for sexual health communication training for clinicians who treat this population so that they can initiate conversations about vaginal health and sexual health in an informed and comfortable manner. The impact of the revised booklet on psychosexual and clinical outcomes is being evaluated in a multicentre RCT.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPamphletsPilot ProjectsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeRectal Neoplasmsanorectal cancerbookletdilatorsgynaecological cancerqualitative studyradiotherapysexual adjustment

Identifiers

PMID26552017
PMCPMC5139047
OpenAlexW2095982934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.