ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
TEES 2.2: Biomedical Event Extraction for Diverse Corpora.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective type label-based synergistic representation learning for biomedical event trigger detection.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A biomedical event extraction method based on fine-grained and attention mechanism.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Biomedical event extraction with a novel combination strategy based on hybrid deep neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- COPIOUS: A gold standard corpus of named entities towards extracting species occurrence from biodiversity literature.Biodiversity data journal · 2019Article
- Extraction of chemical-protein interactions from the literature using neural networks and narrow instance representation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019Article
- Annotation and detection of drug effects in text for pharmacovigilance.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
- Using uncertainty to link and rank evidence from biomedical literature for model curation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- TwiMed: Twitter and PubMed Comparable Corpus of Drugs, Diseases, Symptoms, and Their Relations.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2017Article
- Overview of the Cancer Genetics and Pathway Curation tasks of BioNLP Shared Task 2013.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- BioNLP Shared Task--The Bacteria Track.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Biological event composition.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Overview of the ID, EPI and REL tasks of BioNLP Shared Task 2011.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Semantically linking molecular entities in literature through entity relationships.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Turku Event Extraction System (TEES) is a text mining program developed for the extraction of events, complex biomedical relationships, from scientific literature. Based on a graph-generation approach, the system detects events with the use of a rich feature set built via dependency parsing. The TEES system has achieved record performance in several of the shared tasks of its domain, and continues to be used in a variety of biomedical text mining tasks.
resultsThe TEES system was quickly adapted to the BioNLP'13 Shared Task in order to provide a public baseline for derived systems. An automated approach was developed for learning the underlying annotation rules of event type, allowing immediate adaptation to the various subtasks, and leading to a first place in four out of eight tasks. The system for the automated learning of annotation rules is further enhanced in this paper to the point of requiring no manual adaptation to any of the BioNLP'13 tasks. Further, the scikit-learn machine learning library is integrated into the system, bringing a wide variety of machine learning methods usable with TEES in addition to the default SVM. A scikit-learn ensemble method is also used to analyze the importances of the features in the TEES feature sets.
conclusionsThe TEES system was introduced for the BioNLP'09 Shared Task and has since then demonstrated good performance in several other shared tasks. By applying the current TEES 2.2 system to multiple corpora from these past shared tasks an overarching analysis of the most promising methods and possible pitfalls in the evolving field of biomedical event extraction are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.