Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26551866›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sanitation, Stress, and Life Stage: A Systematic Data Collection Study among Women in Odisha, India.

Kristyna R S Hulland, Rachel P Chase, Bethany A Caruso, Rojalin Swain, Bismita Biswal, Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Pinaki Panigrahi, Robert Dreibelbis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristyna R S HullandCenter for Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Rachel P ChaseJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Bethany A CarusoDepartment of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Center for Global Safe Water, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Rojalin SwainAsian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, India.
Bismita BiswalAsian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, India.
Krushna Chandra SahooAsian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, India.
Pinaki PanigrahiEpidemiology and Pediatrics and Center for Global Health and Development, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Robert DreibelbisCenter for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Asian Institute of Public Health · INEmory University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence demonstrates how inadequate access to water and sanitation is linked to psychosocial stress, especially among women, forcing them to navigate social and physical barriers during their daily sanitation routines. We examine sanitation-related psychosocial stress (SRPS) across women's reproductive lives in three distinct geographic sites (urban slums, rural villages, and rural tribal villages) in Odisha, India. We explored daily sanitation practices of adolescent, newly married, pregnant, and established adult women (n = 60) and identified stressors encountered during sanitation. Responding to structured data collection methods, women ranked seven sanitation activities (defecation, urination, menstruation, bathing, post-defecation cleaning, carrying water, and changing clothes) based on stress (high to low) and level of freedom (associated with greatest freedom to having the most restrictions). Women then identified common stressors they encountered when practicing sanitation and sorted stressors in constrained piles based on frequency and severity of each issue. The constellation of factors influencing SRPS varies by life stage and location. Overall, sanitation behaviors that were most restricted (i.e., menstruation) were the most stressful. Women in different sites encountered different stressors, and the level of perceived severity varied based on site and life stage. Understanding the influence of place and life stage on SRPS provides a nuanced understanding of sanitation, and may help identify areas for intervention.

Indexed as

HygieneAdolescentAdultDrinking WaterFemaleHumansIndiaPoverty AreasPregnancyRural PopulationSanitationStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesToilet FacilitiesUrban PopulationYoung AdultDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID26551866
PMCPMC4638353
OpenAlexW2121303526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.