Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26551018›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2016

A global analysis of parenchyma tissue fractions in secondary xylem of seed plants.

Hugh Morris, Lenka Plavcová, Patrick Cvecko, Esther Fichtler, Mark A F Gillingham, Hugo I Martínez-Cabrera, Daniel J McGlinn, Elisabeth Wheeler, Jingming Zheng, Kasia Ziemińska and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolutionary trade-offs under stochastic water stress shape xylem vulnerability to drought.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Hugh MorrisInstitute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.
Lenka PlavcováInstitute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.
Patrick CveckoInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89069, Ulm, Germany.
Esther FichtlerInstitute of Agronomy in the Tropics, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstrasse 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Mark A F GillinghamInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89069, Ulm, Germany.
Hugo I Martínez-CabreraDépartement des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, UQÁM, CP 8888, Succ. Centre Ville Montréal, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada.
Daniel J McGlinnDepartment of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, 29424, USA.
Elisabeth WheelerDepartment of Forest Biomaterials, NC State University Raleigh, Raleigh, NC, 27695-8005, USA.
Jingming ZhengKey Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Kasia ZiemińskaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Steven JansenInstitute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEBeijing Forestry University · CNCollege of Charleston · USMacquarie University · AUNorth Carolina State University · USUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenchyma is an important tissue in secondary xylem of seed plants, with functions ranging from storage to defence and with effects on the physical and mechanical properties of wood. Currently, we lack a large-scale quantitative analysis of ray parenchyma (RP) and axial parenchyma (AP) tissue fractions. Here, we use data from the literature on AP and RP fractions to investigate the potential relationships of climate and growth form with total ray and axial parenchyma fractions (RAP). We found a 29-fold variation in RAP fraction, which was more strongly related to temperature than with precipitation. Stem succulents had the highest RAP values (mean ± SD: 70.2 ± 22.0%), followed by lianas (50.1 ± 16.3%), angiosperm trees and shrubs (26.3 ± 12.4%), and conifers (7.6 ± 2.6%). Differences in RAP fraction between temperate and tropical angiosperm trees (21.1 ± 7.9% vs 36.2 ± 13.4%, respectively) are due to differences in the AP fraction, which is typically three times higher in tropical than in temperate trees, but not in RP fraction. Our results illustrate that both temperature and growth form are important drivers of RAP fractions. These findings should help pave the way to better understand the various functions of RAP in plants.

Indexed as

ClimateDatabases as TopicMagnoliopsidaMesophyll CellsRainSeedsStatistics, NonparametricTemperatureTracheophytaTreesWoodXylemangiospermsaxial parenchymaconifersgrowth formmean annual precipitationmean annual temperatureray parenchymasecondary xylem

Identifiers

PMID26551018
PMCPMC5063116
OpenAlexW2128404270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.