ReviewBioMed research international2015
Current and new approaches in GMO detection: challenges and solutions.
Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid recombinase polymerase amplification-based detection of theGM crops & food · 2026Article
- Real-time PCR to targetFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Article
- What's in (y)our food? - Occurrence of GM-containing foods on the Nigerian market and compliance with national regulations.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Suitability of Real-Time PCR Methods for New Genomic Technique Detection in the Context of the European Regulations: A Case Study in Arabidopsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- GMOIT: a tool for effective screening of genetically modified crops.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Immunoassays and Mass Spectrometry for Determination of Protein Concentrations in Genetically Modified Crops.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024Review
- An integrated strategy involving high-throughput sequencing to characterize an unknown GM wheat event in Canada.Plant biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Synsor: a tool for alignment-free detection of engineered DNA sequences.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- An Accurate, Rapid and Cost-Effective Method for T-nos Detection Based on CRISPR/Cas12a.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for the Multiple Detection and Identification of Pathogens in Fermented Foods.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Targeted High-Throughput Sequencing Enables the Detection of Single Nucleotide Variations in CRISPR/Cas9 Gene-Edited Organisms.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of T-DNA structure and insertion site in transgenic crops using targeted capture sequencing.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction: Current Techniques, Applications, and Role in COVID-19 Diagnosis.Genes · 2022Review
- Quantum-Dot-Bead-Based Fluorescence-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Sensitive Detection of Cry2A Toxin in Cereals Using Nanobodies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection and identification of authorized and unauthorized GMOs using high-throughput sequencing with the support of a sequence-based GMO database.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Simple and efficient isolation of plant genomic DNA using magnetic ionic liquids.Plant methods · 2022Article
- Timely gene detection assay and reliable screening of genetically engineered plants using an improved direct PCR-based technology.Transgenic research · 2021Article
- Correlation of Cry1Ac mRNA and protein abundance in transgenic3 Biotech · 2021Article
- Selected Instrumental Techniques Applied in Food and Feed: Quality, Safety and Adulteration Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Dual Reproductive Cell-Specific Promoter-Mediated Split-Cre/LoxP System Suitable for Exogenous Gene Deletion in Hybrid Progeny of TransgenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many countries, genetically modified organisms (GMO) legislations have been established in order to guarantee the traceability of food/feed products on the market and to protect the consumer freedom of choice. Therefore, several GMO detection strategies, mainly based on DNA, have been developed to implement these legislations. Due to its numerous advantages, the quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the method of choice for the enforcement laboratories in GMO routine analysis. However, given the increasing number and diversity of GMO developed and put on the market around the world, some technical hurdles could be encountered with the qPCR technology, mainly owing to its inherent properties. To address these challenges, alternative GMO detection methods have been developed, allowing faster detections of single GM target (e.g., loop-mediated isothermal amplification), simultaneous detections of multiple GM targets (e.g., PCR capillary gel electrophoresis, microarray, and Luminex), more accurate quantification of GM targets (e.g., digital PCR), or characterization of partially known (e.g., DNA walking and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)) or unknown (e.g., NGS) GMO. The benefits and drawbacks of these methods are discussed in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.