ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Effects of epidural analgesia with different concentrations of bupivacaine plus fentanyl on pain in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety between liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for paravertebral block in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumor surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Effect of bupivacaine concentration on ultrasound-guided pericapsular group nerve block efficacy in hip surgery patients: comparative, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.British journal of pain · 2024Article
- The Analgesic Efficiency of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Analgesia Compared with Low Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Elective Abdominal Surgery with a Midline Incision: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate and compared the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia with different concentrations of bupivacaine plus fentanyl on pain in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
methods120 cases undergoing elective thoracic surgery were randomly divided into A, B, C and D four groups each with 30 cases, and they were treated with 0.25% (A group), 0.375% (B group), 0.50% (C group) and 0.75% (D group) bupivacaine plus fentanyl 0.4 mg. The pain conditions postoperative 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The PCA pressing numbers and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the four groups.
resultsBy postoperative 4 h, the VAS in D group were obviously lower than those in the other three groups (P all <0.05), and the other three groups showed no significances (P>0.05). However, the four groups showed no significant differences in VAS by postoperative 8 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h (P all >0.05). The incidences of respiratory depression in C and D groups were markedly higher than those in A and B groups (P all <0.05).
conclusions0.25%~0.375% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 0.4 mg using in epidural analgesia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery can lead to safe and effective analgesic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26550381PMC4613066W2191331359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.