ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
A meta-analysis of XPD/ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism and melanoma susceptibility.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimotif Miner 4: a million peptide minimotifs and counting.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Contribution of DNA repair xeroderma pigmentosum group D genotypes to pancreatic cancer risk in the Chinese Han population.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to determine the association between XPD/ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism and melanoma susceptibility. Based on comprehensive searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database, we identified eligible studies about the association between XPD/ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism and melanoma risk. A total of 5,961 cases and 8,669 controls in studies were included in this meta-analysis. All studies were conducted in Caucasian populations. Allele model (Lys vs. Gln: P = 0.53; OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.91-1.05), and homozygous model (Lys/ Lys vs. Gln/Gln: P = 0.32; OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.07) did not show increased risk of developing melanoma. Similarly, dominant model (Lys/ Lys+Lys/Gln vs. Gln/Gln: P = 0.18; OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.03) and recessive model (Lys/ Lys vs. Lys/Gln+Gln/Gln: P = 0.73; OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.09) failed to show increased risk of developing melanoma. Our pooled data suggest that there was no evidence for a major role of XPD/ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism in the pathogenesis of melanoma among Caucasian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26550341PMC4613026What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.