ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Efficacies and adverse reactions of modified vitamin supplement programs before pemetrexed chemotherapy as a second-line treatment against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant wild-type lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to observe the efficacies and adverse reactions of modified vitamin programs before pemetrexed chemotherapy (second-line treatment) against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant wild-type lung adenocarcinoma.
methods477 patients with IIIB, phase IV glomerular filtration rate (GFR) mutant-negative lung adenocarcinomas and performed pemetrexed chemotherapy were collected and divided into group A (167 cases, with modified program) and group B (310 cases, with traditional program). The modified program was: orally administrated 400 μg folic acid once per day and 1 day before the first-round pemetrexed chemotherapy, until the 21st day of the final administration of pemetrexed, and intramuscularly injected 500 μg vitamin B12 1 day before the first-round pemetrexed chemotherapy, and injected once 1 day before every round pemetrexed treatment.
resultsComparison between group A and group B: mean chemotherapy cycles (4.08 vs 3.98); effectiveness rate (22.16% vs 22.90%); disease control rate (56.51% vs 55.00%); without significant difference (P > 0.05). Two groups currently all reached the median overall survival (OS). The median progression-free survival (PFS): 4.2 vs 4.1 months; OS: 12.9 vs 13.2 months, without statistical difference (P > 0.05). Such side effects between the two groups as leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, creatinine increasing, alanine transaminase (ALT) increasing, stomatitis, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia and rash had no significant difference (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe modified vitamin supportive treatment could ensure the efficacy, significantly simplify, facilitate the clinical application, and increase the associated toxicities, indicating that the pemetrexed-based chemotherapy did not need to be delayed because applying the vitamin supportive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26550317PMC4613002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.