ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of estimated treatment effects between randomized controlled trials, case-matched, and cohort studies on laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Pooled it
- Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Journal of gastric cancer · 2019Article
- Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a 10-year single-institution experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: a clinical practice guideline.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2017Article
- Effect of laparoscopic gastrectomy on compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.Medicine · 2017Observational
- Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: Single-Center Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
- Long-term outcome after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2017Article
- Long-term and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis.Journal of minimal access surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Between January 2007 and December 2014, patients with advanced gastric cancer underwent distal gastrectomy by laparoscopic or open approach were identified. Patients in both groups were selected after being matched by age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and clinical TNM stage using propensity score method, to create two comparable groups: laparoscopy and open groups, and prognosis were compared between these two groups. After the patients were matched, 86 patients in each group were selected for analysis. There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological features between the two groups. There were significant differences between the laparoscopy and open groups in terms of blood loss, duration of surgery, and hospital stay. The 5-year overall survival rate was 59% in laparoscopy group, and 56% in open group (P=0.523). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 52% and 46%, respectively (P=0.362). According to the univariate and multivariate analysis, this type of surgical approach was not a prognostic factor for long-term outcomes. The current results indicated that laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is associated with similar overall survival and disease-free survival for advanced gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26550295PMC4612980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.