ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015
A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of doubling dose clopidogrel versus ticagrelor for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome in patients with CYP2C19*2 homozygotes.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles coronary artery disease and stroke patients: a meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy and technical characteristics of CYP2C19 point of care tests: a systematic review.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2YJACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus prasugrel and ticagrelor for coronary artery disease treatment in patients with CYP2C19 LoF alleles: a systemic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Compared efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in treating acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2018Pooled it
- Genotype-Guided Use of P2Y12 Inhibitors: A Review of Current State of the Art.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Efficacy and safety of newer P2YScientific reports · 2020Article
- The Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy Scripts: Precision Medicine Through the Use of Pharmacogenomics: Current Status and Barriers to Implementation.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompared with non-reversible, indirect P2Y12 inhibitor clopidogrel, ticagrelor is a reversible, direct acting inhibitor. The CYP2C19*2 allele is a common genetic variant in individuals that need given higher clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients.
objectiveWe aimed to assess a pharmacogenetic approach of doubling dose clopidogrel compare with standard dose of ticagrelor among carriers with the CYP2C19*2 homozygotes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe compared ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) with clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, 150 mg daily thereafter) for the prevention of cardiovascular events in CYP2C19*2 homozygotes patients admitted to the hospital with an acute coronary syndrome, with or without ST-segment elevation.
resultsAfter genetic test to identify carriers of the CYP2C19*2 allele from 2295 patients, 224 cases with CYP2C19*2 homozygotes were enrolled into our prospective, randomized trial. Patients were random assignment with colpidogrel group (n = 112) and ticagrelor group (n = 112). The two groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. After the first 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel, patients carrying two CYP2C19*2 allele had weaker PRU inhibition (39.8±37.4 vs 27.9±12.4; P = 0.001) and more bleeding adverse events (20.5% vs. 7.1%; hazard ratio = 2.88; 95% [CI], 1.34-6.15; P = 0.001) compared to those taking standard dose of ticagrelor.
conclusionsIn CYP2C19*2 carriers with ACS, ticagrlor is as effective as high clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity, particularly in first days. This study suggests that ticagrelor may be much better than doubling dose clopidogrel in patients with CYP2C19*2 in according to platelet reactivity monitoring. Use of ticagrelor instead of clopidogrel may eliminate the need for genetic testing and lead to less mild bleeding adverse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26550258PMC4612943W2194923682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.