Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26550225›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Association of DNMT3B -283 T > C and -579 G > T polymorphisms with decreased cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Yang Zhang, Haisheng Xu, Yi Shen, Zhimin Gong, Tianlin Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association study of the polymorphisms rs2228611 of theMolecular biology research communications · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Medical College, Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang, Hubei 441000, P.R. China.
Haisheng XuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Medical College, Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang, Hubei 441000, P.R. China.
Yi ShenDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Medical College, Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang, Hubei 441000, P.R. China.
Zhimin GongDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Medical College, Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang, Hubei 441000, P.R. China.
Tianlin XiaoDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Medical College, Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang, Hubei 441000, P.R. China.
Hubei University of Arts and Science · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have explored the association of polymorphisms in the DNA methyltransferase 3b (DNMT3B) gene with the risk of different types of cancer, but yielded controversial results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the association between three widely-studied DNMT3B polymorphisms and overall cancer susceptibility. Totally, 4 studies with 1234 cases and 1337 controls were eligible for DNMT3B -283 T > C (rs6087990), 19 studies with 5332 cases and 7407 controls for DNMT3B -149 C > T (rs2424913), and 14 studies with 3933 cases and 4436 controls for DNMT3B -579 G > T (rs1569686). Overall, DNMT3B -283 T > C was associated with a significantly reduced risk of overall cancer (T vs. C: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71-0.99, P = 0.039). Likewise, the association of DNMT3B -579 G > T with a decreased overall cancer risk was also observed (heterozygous: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.65-0.91, P = 0.003 and dominant: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98, P = 0.029); in the subgroup analysis, the protective association was found for lung and colorectal cancer, but not for head and neck cancer. Finally, the pooled analysis showed no significant association between DNMT3B -149 C > T and overall cancer susceptibility, but stratification analysis indicated that this polymorphism decreased the risk of developing head and neck cancer (heterozygous: OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59-0.90, P = 0.003 and dominant: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.61-0.93, P = 0.009). In conclusion, our results suggested that DNMT3B -283 T > C and DNMT3B -579 G > T but DNMT3B -149 C > T might confer protection against overall cancer risk. In the future, large and well-designed case-control studies are needed to validate our findings.

Indexed as

cancerDNMT3Bmeta-analysispolymorphismsrisk

Identifiers

PMID26550225
PMCPMC4612910
OpenAlexW2417419564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.