Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26550123›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2015

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xiao Liang, Miao Zhou, Jiao-Jiao Feng, Liang Wu, Shang-Ping Fang, Xin-Yu Ge, Hai-Jing Sun, Peng-Cheng Ren, Xin Lv

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Applications of Dexmedetomidine in Palliative and Hospice Care.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiao LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University China.
Miao ZhouJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical College; Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesia, and Analgesia Application Technology, Xuzhou Medical College China.
Jiao-Jiao FengDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Basic Medicine, Second Military Medical University China.
Liang WuJiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical College; Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesia, and Analgesia Application Technology, Xuzhou Medical College China.
Shang-Ping FangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University China.
Xin-Yu GeHebei North University School of Medicine China.
Hai-Jing SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University China.
Peng-Cheng RenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Tangdu Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University China.
Xin LvDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent complication in postoperative period. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine on PONV.

methodsTwo researchers independently searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager.

resultsEighty-two trials with 6,480 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Dexmedetomidine reduced postoperative nausea (Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50 to 0.73) and vomiting (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.64) compared with placebo, with an effective dose of 0.5 ug/kg (RR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.62) and 1.0 ug/kg (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.75), respectively. The antiemetic effect can only be achieved intravenously, not epidurally or intrathecally. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine was similar to that of widely used agents, such as propofol, midazolam etc., but better than opioid analgesics. Moreover, application of dexmedetomidine reduced intraoperative requirement of fentanyl (Standard Mean Difference = -1.91, 95% CI: -3.20 to -0.62).

conclusionsThe present meta-analysis indicates that dexmedetomidine shows superiority to placebo, but not to all other anesthetic agents on PONV. And this efficacy may be related to a reduced consumption of intraoperative opioids.

Indexed as

Dexmedetomidinemeta-analysisnauseavomiting

Identifiers

PMID26550123
PMCPMC4612808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.