Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26550047›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity and Quantitative Indices Between (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and (111)In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT in Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Preliminary Report.

Inki Lee, Jin Chul Paeng, Soo Jin Lee, Chan Soo Shin, Jin-Young Jang, Gi Jeong Cheon, Dong Soo Lee, June-Key Chung, Keon Wook Kang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Imaging-derived biomarkers fromCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Unveiling the potential of copper-61 vs. gallium-68 for SSTR PET imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Head-to-head comparison between [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Systematic Review on Combined [Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Role of Combined [Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  20. Synthesis and Evaluation ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inki LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea.
Jin Chul PaengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea.
Soo Jin LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea.
Chan Soo ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Young JangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gi Jeong CheonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Soo LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
June-Key ChungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Keon Wook KangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn-pentetreotide has been used for neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Recently, (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET has been used with the advantage of high image quality. In this study, we compared quantitative indices between (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT and (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.

methodsThirteen patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively recruited. Patients underwent (111)In-pentetreotide scans with SPECT/CT and (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT before treatment. The number and location of lesions were analyzed on both imaging techniques to compare lesion detectability. Additionally, the maximal uptake count of each lesion and mean uptake count of the lungs were measured on both imagings, and target-to-normal lung ratios (TNR) were calculated as quantitative indices.

resultsAmong 13 patients, 10 exhibited lesions with increased uptake on (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT and/or (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Scans with SPECT/CT detected 19 lesions, all of which were also detected on PET/CT. Moreover, 16 additional lesions were detected on PET/CT (6 in the liver, 9 in the pancreas and 1 in the spleen). PET/CT exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity than SPECT/CT (100 % vs. 54 %, P < 0.001). TNR was significantly higher on PET/CT than on SPECT/CT (99.9 ± 84.3 vs. 71.1 ± 114.9, P < 0.001) in spite of a significant correlation (r = 0.692, P = 0.01).

conclusionGa-DOTATOC PET/CT has a higher diagnostic sensitivity than (111)In-pentetreotide scans with SPECT/CT. The TNR on PET/CT is higher than that of SPECT/CT, which also suggests the higher sensitivity of PET/CT. (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT should be used carefully if it is used instead of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT.

Indexed as

111In-pentetreotide68Ga-DOTATOCNeuroendocrine tumorsPositron emission tomographySingle-photon emission-computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID26550047
PMCPMC4630328
OpenAlexW1459871952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.