Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26549782›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Neurology2016

MRI biomarker assessment of neuromuscular disease progression: a prospective observational cohort study.

Jasper M Morrow, Christopher D J Sinclair, Arne Fischmann, Pedro M Machado, Mary M Reilly, Tarek A Yousry, John S Thornton, Michael G Hanna

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 336 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasper M MorrowMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Christopher D J SinclairMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Arne FischmannNeuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Pedro M MachadoMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Mary M ReillyMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Tarek A YousryMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. Electronic address: t.yousry@ucl.ac.uk.
John S ThorntonMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Michael G HannaMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
University College London · GBMRC Prion Unit · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

trainingU54NS065712 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHY, MICHAEL E. · 2009 to 2023
$19.6M
Medical Research Council G0601943Medical Research Council MR/K000608/1NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial impediment to progress in trials of new therapies in neuromuscular disorders is the absence of responsive outcome measures that correlate with patient functional deficits and are sensitive to early disease processes. Irrespective of the primary molecular defect, neuromuscular disorder pathological processes include disturbance of intramuscular water distribution followed by intramuscular fat accumulation, both quantifiable by MRI. In pathologically distinct neuromuscular disorders, we aimed to determine the comparative responsiveness of MRI outcome measures over 1 year, the validity of MRI outcome measures by cross-sectional correlation against functionally relevant clinical measures, and the sensitivity of specific MRI indices to early muscle water changes before intramuscular fat accumulation beyond the healthy control range.

methodsWe did a prospective observational cohort study of patients with either Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A or inclusion body myositis who were attending the inherited neuropathy or muscle clinics at the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. Genetic confirmation of the chromosome 17p11.2 duplication was required for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A, and classification as pathologically or clinically definite by MRC criteria was required for inclusion body myositis. Exclusion criteria were concomitant diseases and safety-related MRI contraindications. Healthy age-matched and sex-matched controls were also recruited. Assessments were done at baseline and 1 year. The MRI outcomes-fat fraction, transverse relaxation time (T2), and magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR)-were analysed during the 12-month follow-up, by measuring correlation with functionally relevant clinical measures, and for T2 and MTR, sensitivity in muscles with fat fraction less than the 95th percentile of the control group.

findingsBetween Jan 19, 2010, and July 7, 2011, we recruited 20 patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A, 20 patients with inclusion body myositis, and 29 healthy controls (allocated to one or both of the 20-participant matched-control subgroups). Whole muscle fat fraction increased significantly during the 12-month follow-up at calf level (mean absolute change 1.2%, 95% CI 0.5-1.9, p=0.002) but not thigh level (0.2%, -0.2 to 0.6, p=0.38) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A, and at calf level (2.6%, 1.3-4.0, p=0.002) and thigh level (3.3%, 1.8-4.9, p=0.0007) in patients with inclusion body myositis. Fat fraction correlated with the lower limb components of the inclusion body myositis functional rating score (ρ=-0.64, p=0.002) and the Charcot-Marie-Tooth examination score (ρ=0.63, p=0.003). Longitudinal T2 and MTR changed consistently with fat fraction but more variably. In muscles with a fat fraction lower than the control group 95th percentile, T2 was increased in patients compared with controls (regression coefficients: inclusion body myositis thigh 4.0 ms [SE 0.5], calf 3.5 ms [0.6]; Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A thigh 1.0 ms [0.3], calf 2.0 ms [0.3]) and MTR reduced compared with controls (inclusion body myositis thigh -1.5 percentage units [pu; 0.2], calf -1.1 pu [0.2]; Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A thigh -0.3 pu [0.1], calf -0.7 pu [0.1]).

interpretationMRI outcome measures can monitor intramuscular fat accumulation with high responsiveness, show validity by correlation with conventional functional measures, and detect muscle water changes preceding marked intramuscular fat accumulation. Confirmation of our results in further cohorts with these and other muscle-wasting disorders would suggest that MRI biomarkers might prove valuable in experimental trials.

fundingMedical Research Council UK.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAgedBiomarkersCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular DiseasesProspective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26549782
PMCPMC4672173
OpenAlexW2189787157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.