Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26549488›Full record

Trial reportStroke2015

Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit for Stroke Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Tamilyn Bakas, Joan K Austin, Barbara Habermann, Nenette M Jessup, Susan M McLennon, Pamela H Mitchell, Gwendolyn Morrison, Ziyi Yang, Timothy E Stump, Michael T Weaver

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01275495 (Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Stroke Caregivers), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01275495 phase3completednot on this map

Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Stroke Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2010 to 2014Enrolled254ConditionsStroke, Family CaregiversArmsTelephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II), Information, Support, and Referral (ISR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tamilyn BakasFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.). tamilyn.bakas@uc.edu.
Joan K AustinFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Barbara HabermannFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Nenette M JessupFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Susan M McLennonFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Pamela H MitchellFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Gwendolyn MorrisonFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Ziyi YangFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Timothy E StumpFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Michael T WeaverFrom the Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis (T.B., J.K.A., S.M.M.); University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, OH (T.B.); College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark (B.H.); Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis (N.M.J.); School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (P.H.M.); Indianapolis Economics Department, Indiana University Purdue University (G.M.); Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN (Z.Y., T.E.S.); and College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville (M.T.W.).
Indiana University Health · USRichard M. Fairbanks Foundation · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Stroke CaregiversR01NR010388 · NINR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BAKAS, TAMILYN · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010388NINR NIH HHS R01NR010388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere are few evidence-based programs for stroke family caregivers postdischarge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy of the Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK II), a nurse-led intervention enabling caregivers to build skills based on assessment of their own needs.

methodsA total of 254 stroke caregivers (primarily female TASK II/information, support, and referral 78.0%/78.6%; white 70.7%/72.1%; about half spouses 48.4%/46.6%) were randomized to the TASK II intervention (n=123) or to an information, support, and referral group (n=131). Both groups received 8 weekly telephone sessions, with a booster at 12 weeks. General linear models with repeated measures tested efficacy, controlling for patient hospital days and call minutes. Prespecified 8-week primary outcomes were depressive symptoms (with Patient Health Questionnaire Depressive Symptom Scale PHQ-9 ≥5), life changes, and unhealthy days.

resultsAmong caregivers with baseline PHQ-9 ≥5, those randomized to the TASK II intervention had a greater reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline to 8, 24, and 52 weeks and greater improvement in life changes from baseline to 12 weeks compared with the information, support, and referral group (P<0.05); but not found for the total sample. Although not sustained at 12, 24, or 52 weeks, caregivers randomized to the TASK II intervention had a relatively greater reduction in unhealthy days from baseline to 8 weeks (P<0.05).

conclusionsThe TASK II intervention reduced depressive symptoms and improved life changes for caregivers with mild to severe depressive symptoms. The TASK II intervention reduced unhealthy days for the total sample, although not sustained over the long term. CLINICAL

trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01275495.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDepressionFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStrokeYoung Adultcaregiversclinical trialdepressionpsychologystroke

Identifiers

PMID26549488
PMCPMC4659731
OpenAlexW2118524513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.