Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26549118›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2016

Increased Delay Discounting on a Novel Real-Time Task among Girls, but not Boys, with ADHD.

Keri S Rosch, Stewart H Mostofsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Greater delay discounting among girls, but not boys, with ADHD correlates with cognitive control.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keri S Rosch1Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research and Department of Neuropsychology,Kennedy Krieger Institute,Baltimore,MarylandandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.
Stewart H Mostofsky2Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research and Center for Autism and Related Disorders,Kennedy Krieger Institute,Baltimore,MarylandandDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,Maryland.

Funding

Neurology of Deficient Response Control in ADHDR01MH085328 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2009 to 2019
$7.3M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000424 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2012 to 2012
$6.0M
Anomalous Motor Physiology In ADHDR01MH078160 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2006 to 2024
$5.8M
Delay Discounting in Children with ADHD: Neuroimaging and Behavioral CorrelatesK23MH101322 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI ROSCH, KERI SHIELS · 2013 to 2017
$735k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000424NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR 000424-06NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH101322NIMH NIH HHS K23MH101322NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078160NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine delay discounting in girls and boys with ADHD-Combined type (ADHD-C) relative to typically developing (TD) children on two tasks that differ in the extent to which the rewards and delays were experienced by participants. Children ages 8-12 years with ADHD-C (n=65; 19 girls) and TD controls (n=55; 15 girls) completed two delay discounting tasks involving a series of choices between smaller, immediate and larger, delayed rewards. The classic delay discounting task involved choices about money at delays of 1-90 days and only some of the outcomes were actually experienced by the participants. The novel real-time discounting task involved choices about an immediately consumable reward (playing a preferred game) at delays of 25-100 s, all of which were actually experienced by participants. Participants also provided subjective ratings of how much they liked playing the game and waiting to play. Girls with ADHD-C displayed greater delay discounting compared to boys with ADHD-C and TD girls and boys on the real-time discounting task. Diagnostic group differences were not evident on the classic discounting task. In addition, children with ADHD-C reported wanting to play the game more and liking waiting to play the game less than TD children. This novel demonstration of greater delay discounting among girls with ADHD-C on a discounting task in which the rewards are immediately consumable and the delays are experienced in real-time informs our understanding of sex differences and motivational processes in children with ADHD. (JINS, 2016, 22, 12-23).

Indexed as

RewardSex CharacteristicsAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildDelay DiscountingFemaleHumansMaleADHDDelay aversionDelay discountingMotivationRewardSex differencesTemporal discounting

Identifiers

PMID26549118
PMCPMC4780317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.