Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26548913›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2015

A century of the phage: past, present and future.

George P C Salmond, Peter C Fineran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 445 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
445citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
34.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

445 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 797 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Bacteriophage-induced outer membrane protein remodelling drives the phenotypic switching and antibiotic re-sensitization in Klebsiella pneumoniae.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

385 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

George P C SalmondDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK.
Peter C FineranDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G000298/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002677/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses that infect bacteria (bacteriophages; also known as phages) were discovered 100 years ago. Since then, phage research has transformed fundamental and translational biosciences. For example, phages were crucial in establishing the central dogma of molecular biology - information is sequentially passed from DNA to RNA to proteins - and they have been shown to have major roles in ecosystems, and help drive bacterial evolution and virulence. Furthermore, phage research has provided many techniques and reagents that underpin modern biology - from sequencing and genome engineering to the recent discovery and exploitation of CRISPR-Cas phage resistance systems. In this Timeline, we discuss a century of phage research and its impact on basic and applied biology.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesBiological TherapyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMolecular BiologyVirology

Identifiers

PMID26548913
OpenAlexW2174377965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.