Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26547924›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2015

Factors associated with medical student clinical reasoning and evidence based medicine practice.

Arpana R Vidyarthi, Robert Kamei, Kenneth Chan, Sok-Hong Goh, Ngee Lek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A scoping review of clinical reasoning research with Asian healthcare professionals.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evidence-based medicine in pre-clinical years: a study of early introduction and usefulness.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arpana R VidyarthiDuke-NUS (National University of Singapore) Graduate Medical School,Singapore.
Robert KameiDuke-NUS (National University of Singapore) Graduate Medical School,Singapore.
Kenneth ChanDuke-NUS (National University of Singapore) Graduate Medical School,Singapore.
Sok-Hong GohDuke-NUS (National University of Singapore) Graduate Medical School,Singapore.
Ngee LekDuke-NUS (National University of Singapore) Graduate Medical School,Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the factors associated with medical students' clinical reasoning (CR) use and evidence-based medicine (EBM) use in the clinical setting.

methodsOur cross-sectional study surveyed 44 final-year medical students at an emerging academic medical center in Singapore. We queried the students' EBM and CR value and experiences in the classroom and clinical settings. We compared this to their perceptions of supervisors' value and experiences using t-tests. We developed measures of teaching culture and practice culture by combining relevant questions into summary scores. Multivariate linear regression models were applied to identify factors associated with the students' CR and EBM clinical use.

resultsEighty-nine percent of students responded (n=39). Students reported valuing CR (p=0.03) and EBM (p=0.001) more than their supervisors, but practiced these skills similarly (p=0.83; p=0.82). Clinical practice culture and classroom CR experience were independently associated with students' CR clinical use (p=0.05; p=0.04), and classroom EBM experience was independently associated with students' EBM clinical use (p=0.03). Clinical teaching culture was not associated with students' CR and EBM clinical use.

conclusionsOur study found that medical students' classroom experience and the clinical practice culture influenced their CR and EBM use. The clinical teaching culture did not. These findings suggest that in order to increase student CR and EBM use, in addition to providing classroom experience, medical educators may need to change the hospital culture by encouraging supervisors to use these skills in their clinical practice.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineThinkingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultclinical cultureclinical reasoningcurriculum developmentevidence based medicineMedical student education

Identifiers

PMID26547924
PMCPMC4646359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.