Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26547794›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2016

The plant microbiome explored: implications for experimental botany.

Gabriele Berg, Daria Rybakova, Martin Grube, Martina Köberl

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed
44.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 540 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Decoding the rhizosphere microbiome againstFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  13. Characterization of the gut microbiome of wildFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriele BergGraz University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, 8010 Graz, Austria Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (ACIB GmbH), 8010 Graz, Austria.
Daria RybakovaGraz University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Martin GrubeUniversity of Graz, Institute of Plant Sciences, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Martina KöberlGraz University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, 8010 Graz, Austria Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Sciences Division, Richland, WA 99352, USA.
Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) · ATGraz University of Technology · ATPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of microbial root inhabitants for plant growth and health was recognized as early as 100 years ago. Recent insights reveal a close symbiotic relationship between plants and their associated microorganisms, and high structural and functional diversity within plant microbiomes. Plants provide microbial communities with specific habitats, which can be broadly categorized as the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and endosphere. Plant-associated microbes interact with their host in essential functional contexts. They can stimulate germination and growth, help plants fend off disease, promote stress resistance, and influence plant fitness. Therefore, plants have to be considered as metaorganisms within which the associated microbes usually outnumber the cells belonging to the plant host. The structure of the plant microbiome is determined by biotic and abiotic factors but follows ecological rules. Metaorganisms are co-evolved species assemblages. The metabolism and morphology of plants and their microbiota are intensively connected with each other, and the interplay of both maintains the functioning and fitness of the holobiont. Our study of the current literature shows that analysis of plant microbiome data has brought about a paradigm shift in our understanding of the diverse structure and functioning of the plant microbiome with respect to the following: (i) the high interplay of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists; (ii) the high specificity even at cultivar level; (iii) the vertical transmission of core microbiomes; (iv) the extraordinary function of endophytes; and (v) several unexpected functions and metabolic interactions. The plant microbiome should be recognized as an additional factor in experimental botany and breeding strategies.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBotanyPlantsEndosphereholobiontmicrobiomephyllosphereplant-microbe interactionrhizosphere.

Identifiers

PMID26547794
PMCPMC5395086
OpenAlexW2226553788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.