Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26547598›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

Community pharmacist participation in a practice-based research network: a report from the Medication Safety Research Network of Indiana (Rx-SafeNet).

Puja Patel, Heather Hemmeger, Mary Ann Kozak, Stephanie A Gernant, Margie E Snyder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Collaborative pharmacy research across integrated health systems: A purpose and promise for opportunities to study the complete medication-use process.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Puja PatelEskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN; At time of research, Student Pharmacist, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Heather HemmegerMeijer Pharmacy, Plainfield, IN; at time of research, Student Pharmacist, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Mary Ann KozakCommunity Pharmacy Research, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Stephanie A GernantCollege of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL; At time of research, Hook Drug Foundation Fellow in Community Practice Research, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Margie E SnyderCollege of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Electronic address: snyderme@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USNova Southeastern University · US

Funding

Optimizing Medication Therapy Management for Chronically Ill Medicare Part D BeneK08HS022119 · AHRQ · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MARGIE E · 2013 to 2015
$420k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS022119AHRQ HHS K08HS022119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the experiences and opinions of pharmacists serving as site coordinators for the Medication Safety Research Network of Indiana (Rx-SafeNet).

settingRetail chain, independent, and hospital/health system outpatient community pharmacies throughout Indiana, with a total of 127 pharmacy members represented by 26 site coordinators. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Rx-SafeNet, a statewide practice-based research network (PBRN) formed in 2010 and administered by the Purdue University College of Pharmacy.

main outcome measuresBarriers and facilitators to participation in available research studies, confidence participating in research, and satisfaction with overall network communication.

results22 of 26 site coordinators participated, resulting in an 85% response rate. Most (72.2%) of the respondents had received a doctor of pharmacy degree, and 13.6% had postgraduate year (PGY)1 residency training. The highest reported benefits of PBRN membership were an enhanced relationship with the Purdue University College of Pharmacy (81% agreed or strongly agreed) and enhanced professional development (80% agreed or strongly agreed). Time constraints were identified as the greatest potential barrier to network participation, reported by 62% of respondents. In addition, the majority (59%) of survey respondents identified no prior research experience. Last, respondents' confidence in performing research appeared to increase substantially after becoming network members, with 43% reporting a lack of confidence in engaging in research before joining the network compared with 90% reporting confidence after joining the network.

conclusionIn general, Rx-SafeNet site coordinators appeared to experience increased confidence in research engagement after joining the network. While respondents identified a number of benefits associated with network participation, concerns about potential time constraints remained a key barrier to participation. These findings will assist network leadership in identifying opportunities to positively increase member participation in the future.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPharmacistsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndianaLeadershipMaleMedication ErrorsMiddle AgedPatient SafetyProfessional Role

Identifiers

PMID26547598
PMCPMC5536969
OpenAlexW2263907638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.