Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26547549›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

The importance of the belief that "light" cigarettes are smoother in misperceptions of the harmfulness of "light" cigarettes in the Republic of Korea: a nationally representative cohort study.

Annika C Green, Geoffrey T Fong, Ron Borland, Anne C K Quah, Hong Gwan Seo, Yeol Kim, Tara Elton-Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Annika C GreenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. a7green@uwaterloo.ca.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. geoffrey.fong@uwaterloo.ca.
Ron BorlandThe Cancer Council, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. ron.borland@cancervic.org.au.
Anne C K QuahDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. ackquah@uwaterloo.cap.
Hong Gwan SeoCenter for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea. hongwan@ncc.re.kr.
Yeol KimDivision of Cancer Management and Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea. drheat10@gmail.com.
Tara Elton-MarshallSocial and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, Ontario, Canada. Tara.EltonMarshall@camh.ca.
University of Waterloo · CANational Cancer Center · KRCancer Council Victoria · AUCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

Project 3: Policy Effects on Cigarette Design, Emissions &BehaviorP50CA111236 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2004 to 2009
$8.2M
Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation in China and South Korea: The ITC Asia ProjectR01CA125116 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Canadian Institutes of Health Research 115016Canadian Institutes of Health Research 79551NCI NIH HHS P50 CA111236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of countries have banned misleading cigarette descriptors such as "light" and "low-tar" as called for by the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. These laws, however, do not address the underlying cigarette design elements that contribute to misperceptions about harm. This is the first study to examine beliefs about "light" cigarettes among Korean smokers, and the first to identify factors related to cigarette design that are associated with the belief that "light" cigarettes are less harmful.

methodsWe analysed data from Wave 3 of the ITC Korea Survey, a telephone survey of a nationally representative sample of 1,753 adult smokers, conducted October - December 2010. A multinomial logistic regression was used to examine which factors were associated with the belief that "light" cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes.

resultsOne quarter (25.0 %) of smokers believed that "light" cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes, 25.8 % believed that smokers of "light" brands take in less tar, and 15.5 % held both of these beliefs. By far the strongest predictor of the erroneous belief that "light" cigarettes are less harmful was the belief that "light" cigarettes are smoother on the throat and chest (p < 0.001, OR = 44.8, 95 % CI 23.6-84.9).

conclusionsThe strong association between the belief that "light" cigarettes are smoother on the throat and chest and the belief that "light" cigarettes are less harmful, which is consistent with previous research, provides further evidence of the need to not only ban "light" descriptors, but also prohibit cigarette design and packaging features that contribute to the perception of smoothness.

Indexed as

PerceptionTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProduct LabelingRepublic of KoreaSmokingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26547549
PMCPMC4637138
OpenAlexW2136060353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.