Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26547100›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2016

Effect of the REG1 anticoagulation system versus bivalirudin on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (REGULATE-PCI): a randomised clinical trial.

A Michael Lincoff, Roxana Mehran, Thomas J Povsic, Steven L Zelenkofske, Zhen Huang, Paul W Armstrong, P Gabriel Steg, Christoph Bode, Mauricio G Cohen, Christopher Buller and 24 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01848106 (A Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group Study To Determine the Efficacy and Safety of the REG1 Anticoagulation System Compared to Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01848106 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group Study To Determine the Efficacy and Safety of the REG1 Anticoagulation System Compared to Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegado Biosciences, Inc.Ran2013 to 2014Enrolled3,232ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmspegnivacogin/anivamersen, Bivalirudin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

A Michael LincoffCleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: lincofa@ccf.org.
Roxana MehranMount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas J PovsicDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Steven L ZelenkofskeRegado Biosciences, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
Zhen HuangDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Paul W ArmstrongCanadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
P Gabriel StegUniversité Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Christoph BodeUniversity of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Mauricio G CohenUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Christopher BullerSt Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peep LaanmetsNorth Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.
Marco ValgimigliUniversity Hospital of Ferrara, Institute of Cardiology, Ferrara, Italy.
Toomas MarandiNorth Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.
Viliam FridrichNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Warren J CantorSouthlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada.
Bela MerkelySemmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Jose Lopez-SendonHospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain.
Jan H CornelMedical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands.
Jaroslaw D KasprzakMedical University of Lodz, Bieganski Hospital, Lodz, Poland.
Michael AschermannGeneral University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Victor GuettaHeart Institute Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Joao MoraisSanto Andre's Hospital, Leiria, Portugal.
Peter R SinnaeveUniversity Hospitals Leuven Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Kurt HuberWilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Rod StablesLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Mary Ann SellersDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Marilyn BorgmanCleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (C5Research), Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lauren GlennRegado Biosciences, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
Arnold I LevinsonPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Renato D LopesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Vic HasselbladDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Richard C BeckerUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
John H AlexanderDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
REGULATE-PCI Investigators
Clinical Research Institute · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USNorth Estonia Medical Centre · EERegen BioPharma (United States) · USCanadian VIGOUR Centre · CAGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZHospital Universitario La Paz · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMedical University of Lodz · PLMedisch Centrum Alkmaar · NLNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases · SKSemmelweis University · HUSheba Medical Center · ILSorbonne Paris Cité · FRSouthlake Regional Health Center · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundREG1 is a novel anticoagulation system consisting of pegnivacogin, an RNA aptamer inhibitor of coagulation factor IXa, and anivamersen, a complementary sequence reversal oligonucleotide. We tested the hypothesis that near complete inhibition of factor IXa with pegnivacogin during percutaneous coronary intervention, followed by partial reversal with anivamersen, would reduce ischaemic events compared with bivalirudin, without increasing bleeding.

methodsWe did a randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre, superiority trial to compare REG1 with bivalirudin at 225 hospitals in North America and Europe. We planned to randomly allocate 13,200 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in a 1:1 ratio to either REG1 (pegnivacogin 1 mg/kg bolus [>99% factor IXa inhibition] followed by 80% reversal with anivamersen after percutaneous coronary intervention) or bivalirudin. Exclusion criteria included ST segment elevation myocardial infarction within 48 h. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned target lesion revascularisation by day 3 after randomisation. The principal safety endpoint was major bleeding. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01848106. The trial was terminated early after enrolment of 3232 patients due to severe allergic reactions.

findings1616 patients were allocated REG1 and 1616 were assigned bivalirudin, of whom 1605 and 1601 patients, respectively, received the assigned treatment. Severe allergic reactions were reported in ten (1%) of 1605 patients receiving REG1 versus one (<1%) of 1601 patients treated with bivalirudin. The composite primary endpoint did not differ between groups, with 108 (7%) of 1616 patients assigned REG1 and 103 (6%) of 1616 allocated bivalirudin reporting a primary endpoint event (odds ratio [OR] 1·05, 95% CI 0·80-1·39; p=0·72). Major bleeding was similar between treatment groups (seven [<1%] of 1605 receiving REG1 vs two [<1%] of 1601 treated with bivalirudin; OR 3·49, 95% CI 0·73-16·82; p=0·10), but major or minor bleeding was increased with REG1 (104 [6%] vs 65 [4%]; 1·64, 1·19-2·25; p=0·002).

interpretationThe reversible factor IXa inhibitor REG1, as currently formulated, is associated with severe allergic reactions. Although statistical power was limited because of early termination, there was no evidence that REG1 reduced ischaemic events or bleeding compared with bivalirudin.

fundingRegado Biosciences Inc.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedAnticoagulantsAptamers, NucleotideCoagulantsDrug HypersensitivityEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsEuropeFactor IXaFemaleHemorrhageHirudinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaAnticoagulantsAptamers, NucleotidebivalirudinCoagulantsFactor IXaHirudinsOligonucleotidesPeptide FragmentsRB 006RB 007Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26547100
OpenAlexW2129534492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.