Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26546673›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

Bacillus subtilis δ Factor Functions as a Transcriptional Regulator by Facilitating the Open Complex Formation.

Ranjit Kumar Prajapati, Shreya Sengupta, Paulami Rudra, Jayanta Mukhopadhyay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transcription activation inEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. σJournal of bacteriology · 2018
    Article
  7. Solution structure of domain 1.1 of the σThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Blueprint of a Minimal Cell: MiniBacillus.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ranjit Kumar PrajapatiFrom the Department of Chemistry, Bose Institute, Kolkata-700009, India.
Shreya SenguptaFrom the Department of Chemistry, Bose Institute, Kolkata-700009, India.
Paulami RudraFrom the Department of Chemistry, Bose Institute, Kolkata-700009, India.
Jayanta MukhopadhyayFrom the Department of Chemistry, Bose Institute, Kolkata-700009, India jayanta@jcbose.ac.in.
Bose Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAP) contain five conserved subunits, viz. 2α, β, β', and ω. However, in many Gram-positive bacteria, especially in fermicutes, RNAP is associated with an additional factor, called δ. For over three decades since its identification, it had been thought that δ functioned as a subunit of RNAP to enhance the level of transcripts by recycling RNAP. In support of the previous observations, we also find that δ is involved in recycling of RNAP by releasing the RNA from the ternary complex. We further show that δ binds to RNA and is able to recycle RNAP when the length of the nascent RNA reaches a critical length. However, in this work we decipher a new function of δ. Performing biochemical and mutational analysis, we show that Bacillus subtilis δ binds to DNA immediately upstream of the promoter element at A-rich sequences on the abrB and rrnB1 promoters and facilitates open complex formation. As a result, δ facilitates RNAP to initiate transcription in the second scale, compared with minute scale in the absence of δ. Using transcription assay, we show that δ-mediated recycling of RNAP cannot be the sole reason for the enhancement of transcript yield. Our observation that δ does not bind to RNAP holo enzyme but is required to bind to DNA upstream of the -35 promoter element for transcription activation suggests that δ functions as a transcriptional regulator.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialTranscription Initiation, GeneticAT Rich SequenceBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA FootprintingElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayFluorescence PolarizationFluorescent DyesMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPoint MutationPromoter Regions, GeneticRecombinant ProteinsRhodaminesAbrB protein, Bacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesFluorescent DyesRecombinant ProteinsRhodaminesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSigma FactortetramethylrhodamineTranscription FactorsBacillus subtilisdelta factorDNA binding proteingram-positive bacteriaRNA polymerasetranscriptiontranscriptional regulatortranscription regulation

Identifiers

PMID26546673
PMCPMC4714191
OpenAlexW2228129041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.